Doctor Cleveland's picture

    Republicans Against the Right to Vote

    The first time I went to the polls on Election Day I was probably five, tagging along beside my mother. It was a brilliant November day in New Hampshire, and the polls were in a spare room of the town hall, the same room where I would go in later years for Cub Scout meetings and later still walk through on the way to help stock our town's tiny food assistance pantry. There was a larger room upstairs, where the annual Town Meeting was held and where I would someday go for Halloween parties and the soap box derby. The thing I remember most clearly was walking out of Town Hall after Mom was through voting. About ten feet in front of us, an exit poller asked an older man, a genuinely flinty-looking old Yankee, who he'd voted for. He declined to say, with a curt-and-not-unfriendly "no," and kept walking. I asked my mother why the man hadn't answered the question.

    "You don't have to tell anyone how you voted," she said. As a five-year-old, I was awestruck by the idea of not having to do anything; that no one could make you was basically the most impressive thing I ever heard. I didn't know the words "inalienable" or "citizen," but the lesson got across and it stuck with me. I can still see the set of that old man's shoulders and his proud, confident stride in the autumn sunlight. It's my picture of American citizenship.

    I pretty much fell in love with voting, right then. Haven't gotten over it. Never will.

    Six years ago I moved to Ohio, four months before a national election: clearly long enough to establish residency to vote, but more importantly clearly too long to vote in my previous state of residence. The law was very clear about where I should be voting. But there was a problem: the Ohio Secretary of State was actively trying to discourage voter registration.

    You read that right. The Secretary of State, the person in charge of state elections, wanted to keep new voters from registering, and actively tried to lay the groundwork to have voter registrations challenged and thrown out. Why? Because he was a Republican, and he thought that the Democrats' voter-registration drive would hurt his party. My favorite moment was when he declared that new voters' registration cards would be summarily thrown out unless they were on 80-pound paper stock. (For comparison, bond paper for legal documents is typically 20 or 24 pounds.) This gambit ultimately failed when it turned out that the Ohio Secretary of State's office did not actually have any paper that heavy itself. Then the Republican Party won the right to put challengers, not observers but challengers, inside polling places on Election Day, trying to get votes thrown out.

    As a newly registered voter, I took that to heart. For the first time in my life, I went to my legal polling place feeling nervous about my rights as an American citizen. It was the Ohio Republican Party that made me worry about the exercise of my rights.

    That was the first election that I worked as a Democratic volunteer.

    The national Republican Party and the Tea Party movement both remain deeply committed to preventing other Americans from voting. They routinely use bogus accusations of voter fraud, dirty tricks, and even illegal polling-place electioneering in order to deprive fellow Americans of their most basic rights as Americans. I have met a voter who had a Republican challenger try to throw out his vote because he signed a "Junior" at the end of his name and the printed list had left out the "junior." That's the spirit of democracy right there. Two years ago, someone went through an African-American neighborhood in Cleveland and put misleading stickers on door hangers: the door hangers reminded people to vote; the stickers were added to deliberately give those voters the wrong address for the polls, hoping that those Americans would be disenfranchised. I saw those stickers myself.

    There is no excuse for this. And this is not conservatism. This not American. It's an admission that the Republicans know their policies are bad, and want to prevent people from having their say. But even if the Republicans had the soundest policy ideas in the world, it would be wrong. They have no right to take away anyone else's vote.

    Don't tell me about their traditional values. I grew up in a little New England town that still had a town meeting: everyone in town showed up at the town hall and voted on the budget, line by line. I know what old-fashioned American democracy looks like. This is not it. I disagree with the Republicans on policy because I'm a progressive. But it's the conservative part of me, the part that loves what is old and best in America, that actually hates them.

    If the Tea Party lends itself to voter suppression and intimidation, it has no right even to speak about the Founders or the Sons of Liberty. Voter suppression is an attack on the Constitution. It is an affront to the Declaration of Independence. And anyone who obstructs another American's rights as a citizen has broken faith with America. This is not an expression of "small town values." It not traditional. It is not conservative. It is an expression of something new, and vicious. It is an expression of hatred for individual rights and personal liberty.

    There are issues that require compromise, when compromise is reasonable. The right to vote is not one of them. It never will be.

    Comments

    Righteous indignation done right. Awesome.


    The late Chief Justice Rehnquist cut his Republican vote squashing legal teeth in Phoenix, Arizona harassing and intimidating minorities seeking to cast ballots.


    I agree absolutely Doc Cleveland. The right to vote is an inaliable right, not subject to compromise. Or so we were taught by our parents and by our teachers -- people we had every reason to believe, for most of our lives.

    I had the following Florida voting experiences in 2000 and in 2004, for which redundancy -- because I cited them on TPM -- I apologize.

    In 2000 I was livingi in Miami, in Dade County; therefore, I was offered the opportunity to vote on the infamous dangling chad ballot, which was presented in a layout that, no matter what level of education or even graphic expertise, truly made it difficult to see whether the significant punch would record a vote for Gore, as intended, or for Pat Buchanan. One could only hope for the best.

    In 2004, in Pensacola, Republican offenses were more batant: it was alarming that advance voting was held in the courthouse, on the top floor but, curiously, on the specified day, none of the four elevators were working. Therefore, it was necessary to queue in the un-airconditioned fire stairs, in which people moved at a snail's pace up one stair after another, for hours.

    Many blue collar people had taken time off from work to vote, and could not sustain the hours off the clock without pay to endure the line. Others were elderly, infirm in one way or another, and could not sustain the intense heat in combination with standing for hours, faltering up endless stairs.

    The result was that I watched as person after person gave up, understandably, if dismayingly, giving up their constitutional right to vote in favor of a paycheck, or the ability to breathe.

    But there was more: once entry to the voting room was achieved, there was what struck me, after decades of voting elsewhere, untoward scrutiny of voter registration cards; I watched as more people -- curiously black people, young people, and women -- were turned away.

    Did I mention that the polling room was manned entirely by Republican bureaucrats?

    The fact is that we have been slow on the uptake in terms of facing how far the Far Right will go to deny you, and me, our constitutional right to vote. That's probably because it is anathema to any sane American that any other American would stoop so low.

    I've recently moved and re-registered. I confess I feel on edge about what circumstances I will encounter tomorrow, in a district entirely controlled by Republicans, when I am a registered Democrat.

    Excellent topic, Doc Cleveland. And oh-so-timely.


    "I disagree with the Republicans on policy because I'm a progressive. But it's the conservative part of me, the part that loves what is old and best in America, that actually hates them."

    Awesome.  This gave me goosebumps.

    "And anyone who obstructs another American's rights as a citizen has broken faith with America. This is not an expression of "small town values." It not traditional. It is not conservative. It is an expression of something new, and vicious. It is an expression of hatred for individual rights and personal liberty."

    Well, of course, that's why "liberty" is uttered as every fifth or sixth word by the Tea Party's sunshine patriots.  It's a defense mechanism to keep their heads from exploding.  Kind of like Fox News' constant use of "Fair and Balanced."


    The Dems need to get out and vote on Tuesday and send a clear message to the Tea Party that the majority of the country does not support their right wing candidates or tactics. One Bachmann is enough as indicated on  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4leO4b1xgMQ


    Of course, these days they're trying to steal votes in New Hampshire, too.


    If democrats did not have such a vile history of lying and cheating at polling sites and during fraudulent recounts and fabrication of absentee ballots, Ohio would not have to go to such extreme measures.


    Latest Comments