Dr. C: The Unpleasant Exclusivity in Our Educational System
Wolraich: The Grim Possibility Of War With Iran
Heat Win Game Six, Disappointing Nation of Heat-Haters
|
Dr. C: The Unpleasant Exclusivity in Our Educational System Wolraich: The Grim Possibility Of War With Iran Heat Win Game Six, Disappointing Nation of Heat-Haters |
Shuts & |
NOTE: This is a repeat of a blog post from October, 2010, the year the Democrats lost the edge by losing the House to the Tea Party and the Right Wing. If it looks like I'm nagging, what you're reading is pure desperation. If the lines in bold-face look like I'm gloating because I was right, look more closely. They're covered in bitter tears.
I'm repeating this because we're at that place again and if we couldn't afford to lose in 2010 we really, truly can't afford to lose in 2012.
We all know that certain people who make it a practice to depreciate the accomplishments of labor - who even attack labor as unpatriotic - they keep this up usually for three years and six months in a row. But then, for some strange reason they change their tune- every four years- just before election day. When votes are at stake, they suddenly discover that they really love labor and that they are anxious to protect labor from its old friends.
I got quite a laugh, for example - and I am sure that you did - when I read this plank in the Republican platform adopted at their National Convention in Chicago last July: "The Republican Party accepts the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act, the Wage and Hour Act, the Social Security Act and all other Federal statutes designed to promote and protect the welfare of American working men and women, and we promise a fair and just administration of these laws."
You know, many of the Republican leaders and Congressmen and candidates, who shouted enthusiastic approval of that plank in that Convention Hall would not even recognize these progressive laws if they met them in broad daylight. Indeed, they have personally spent years of effort and energy - and much money - in fighting every one of those laws in the Congress, and in the press, and in the courts, ever since this Administration began to advocate them and enact them into legislation. That is a fair example of their insincerity and of their inconsistency.
The whole purpose of Republican oratory these days seems to be to switch labels. The object is to persuade the American people that the Democratic Party was responsible for the 1929 crash and the depression, and that the Republican Party was responsible for all social progress under the New Deal.
Now, imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery - but I am afraid that in this case it is the most obvious common or garden variety of fraud.
FDR, September 23, 1944
Okay, I feel like the mother hen here--the dotty old mother hen who keeps repeating herself, even when it's clear that nobody wants to listen. We mother hens do this, not because we're so keen on being royal pains-in-the-ass, but because we're keen on looking at the big picture and keeping it real.
The press is profiting from the looniness of the Right Wing and spends almost all of their time mooning over them. Meanwhile, the good folks with mountains of practical, beneficent ideas but no talent for hawking them sit around and wait their turn. Still, I'm seeing encouraging signs of a momentum building. The Huffington Post, for example, has a new page called "Third World America", where real people talk about real problems and real solutions. Elizabeth Warren finally has the president's ear, and someone is actually quoting the irrepressibly sensible Bernie Sanders. Al Franken's heart is a hit on the senate floor. Rachel Maddow has become an unlikely and refreshingly brilliant star. Lawrence O'Donnell--smart guy in his own right--has his own show. Michael Moore gives the Dems five steps to a win and in his follow-up he sees some progress. And President Obama is beginning to sound like his old self.
So what's it going to be? The Republicans taking over congress and making sure none of our programs ever see the light of day? Or the Democrats winning a clear majority, sending a message to the entire country about where our priorities must lie?
I'm declaring a moratorium on Democrat-bashing until the elections are over. It's only another month. If the Democrats win, we'll have a chance to hold their feet to the fire to get things done. If they lose, we'll have no chance at all.
I'm going for that chance, whatever it takes, and I hope you will, too.
(Cross-posted at Ramona's Voices)
Reuters, June 19, 2013
CAIRO - Egypt's tourism minister tendered his resignation on Tuesday over President Mohamed Mursi's decision to appoint as governor of Luxor a member of a hardline Islamist group blamed for slaughtering 58 tourists there in 1997.
Prime Minister Hisham Kandil did not accept the resignation of Tourism Minister Hisham Zaazou, who remains in the post for now. However, the move pointed to a split in government over an appointment that one critic called "the last nail in the coffin" of the tourism industry.
Mursi appointed Adel Mohamed al-Khayat, a member of al-Gamaa al-Islamiya, as Luxor governor this week, a move seen as a sign of a deepening political alliance between the once-armed group and the...
By Robert Mackey, The Lede @ nytimes.com, June 18, 2013
Includes lots of images and videos.
Last Updated, 6:57 p.m. As my colleague Simon Romero reports from São Paulo, more than 200,000 Brazilians filled the streets in cities across the country on Monday to protest the high cost of living and lavish spending on soccer stadiums ahead of next year’s World Cup, in demonstrations that have intensified as images of police brutality against peaceful protesters spread on...
How Obama's pick to lead the FBI tried to put the brakes on the NSA's surveillance dragnet.
By Marc Ambinder, Foreign Policy, June 18, 2013
[....] Comey, who is said to be President Obama's choice to be the next director of the FBI, has never publicly disclosed exactly what he refused to sanction when he was briefly acting attorney general during Ashcroft's hospital stay, but people briefed on the program who have spoken to Comey say it was the legal rationale giving the NSA quick access to un-sifted telecom and service provider-collected metadata that "drove him bonkers," not the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program. There was just no way, Comey thought, to justify an effort that simply...
'Peace and reconciliation' milestone comes after US drops request for formal rejection of al-Qaida as precondition to talks
By Dan Roberts in Washington and Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul, guardian.co.uk, 18 June 2013
[....] White House officials say they believe the Taliban delegation at the talks represents the movement's leadership, and includes more radical groups such as the Haqqani network. Officials said the US would have a direct role in the talks starting starting this week in Doha, but the substantive negotiations over the future of Afghanistan would then be led by the Afghan government.
"The core of this process is not going to be US-Taliban talks – we can help the process – but the core is going...
According to some well-placed Israeli commentators, the best Israel can hope for is that Assad holds on but only just. That would keep the regime in place, or boxed into its heartland, but sapped of the energy to concern itself with anything other than immediate matters of survival.
In closed-door discussions, analyst Ben Caspit has noted, the Israeli army has put forward its “optimal scenario”: Syria breaking up into three separate states, with Assad confined to an Alawite canton in Damascus and along the coast.
A long war of attrition between Assad and the opposition has additional benefits for Israel following the decision by Hizbullah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, to draft thousands of fighters to assist the...
We'll pretend we didn't have anything to do with it...
No, what they/we will say is that Obama blew and the Democrats in general blew it. If only he and they had followed "our" advice, been real liberals, hadn't thrown so and so under the bus... he and they would have been elected.
Pew has Romney up by 5.
Sorry...Gallup.
Well hallelujah or however you spell the damn thing.
hahahahaha
We gotta come together against an evil enemy that is in lock step all the time.
Oh we find a Snow or a Collins who deviates sometimes.
But damn.
There is an evil enemy out there, and we must defeat him!
ha!
Excellent. Perhaps you could create a pledge for us to sign, a contract as it were in case some forget.
And post this weekly.
Just a reminder, Aunt Sam. We lost in 2010 but we have a chance to get it back in 2012--if we don't make the same mistakes.
If a Republican president had done as poorly as Obama did during the first debate you would never have heard about it from the Republicans. That's the difference between us, and that's how they win.
Wish it wasn't so.
As you said a while back, we are fair-weather friends.
We're beguiled by the (false) idea that there are no differences between the parties.
If our guy compromises, he's a traitor and, even, evil.
You know, some of us are curling up with a good book.
Others are voting for Romney in the expectation that, suddenly, the Democrats will start fighting.
Others are giving their vote to Jill Stein or Rocky Anderson because, hey, they STAND for something.
Black folks are saying, "What has he done for us and why hasn't he closed the income gap. He had four years? And what's he doing messin' with them homos, anyway?"
Unfortunately (for us) Obama has many gifts, but being a politician isn't really one of them. He works hard and fights in his own way--but he ain't a bare knuckle fighter.
Or maybe he is...
Women now are showing up heavily for Romney in the polls.
Peter, I think you've hit on what could be our biggest problem. What an eye-opener that statement is. Yes, we expect a lawyer and community activist to be aggressive (or at least assertive) and quick on his feet, but he just isn't.
Now is not the time to be cautious or deferential. Even worse when you're up on stage in the middle of a debate that could just swing the election.
And I just don't get why women are all of a sudden leaning toward Romney. Nothing has changed, and he still has Paul Ryan, misogynist supreme, as his running mate. It's not because Ann Romney is such a nice person, either. I'm hoping it's just skewed numbers and not a trend.