Richard Day's picture

    DEMENTIA & TEABAGGERS

    File:The Rake's Progress 8.jpg
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT-SFgkVlno&feature=related

     

    A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, even before Ronald Reagan was born, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter:

    Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists. The passage reads, "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."

     

    That seems clear enough, does it not?

    I mean the darling of the repubs is now (supposedly) Thomas Jefferson instead of Abraham Lincoln and here is one of Jefferson’s letters. This particular letter was sent to the elders of this small Baptist Church in direct response to a letter those elders sent to Thomas Jefferson. I mean old Tom did not wake up one day and think:

    Maybe I should bother some Baptists today?

    I suppose you could just challenge the provenance of the letter.

    You could spend a lot of money researching the chain of custody of this letter low these years.

    You could buy some handwriting experts and have them render their professional expert opinions that the letter is a forgery.  It would be even better if the experts could somehow link the real author to atheism or murder or New York politics.

    But the letter, regardless of parsing talks about building a wall of separation between Church & State. And the letter was sent by Thomas Jefferson to a church in Danbury.

    So our third President was not making some side statement to reel in some votes.

    He straight out wrote a church that there must be a wall built metaphorically between government and religion. People should have the opportunity to worship as they desire and the government should not interfere with that worship.

    On the other hand, government should function without interference from various and sundry churches.

    So I was scanning TPM today and found this gem:

    …a GOP candidate (for a Delaware Congressional Seat), Glen Urquhart, appeared in a video yesterday in which he says that Thomas Jefferson was not the origin of the concept of "separation of Church and State." Urquhart says Hitler originated the idea.

    "Do you know, where does this phrase separation of Church and State come from? Does anybody know? ... Actually, that's exactly, it was not in Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists. He was reassuring that the federal government wouldn't trample on their religion. The exact phrase 'separation of Church and State' came out of Adolph Hitler's mouth, that's where it comes from. Next time your liberal friends talk about the separation of Church and State ask them why they're Nazis."

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016873-503544.html

    http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/hitler-was-weirdly-popular-on-wall-street-yesterday.php?ref=fpb

     

    How is anyone going to argue with this Urquhart or people like him? I mean you cannot send him to Wiki where there is a discussion of the Danbury Letter. He would just tell you that communists are in charge of wikipedia.

    You could tell him to Google the Danbury Letter…and get hundreds of results; most sending you to articles discussing and reprinting the letter.

    It seems like a small point but Gary Bauer, Glenn Beck, Michele Bachman, Sarah Palin, and countless others who compose the tea baggers and repubs will tell you that there is no Constitutional Wall separating Church and State.

    And actually I have heard Beck within the last couple of years state that the separation of church and state is an invention of Adolph Hitler.

    I think it is possible to have a sane discussion of First Amendment Guaranties. For heavens sake the Amendment attempts to present a balancing act between the power of the clergy and government in general. And so the courts over the last couple of centuries come across individual instances where freedom of expression might conflict with a demand that the government not establish a religion.

    But when you straight out say that Hitler had this wall of separation idea before anyone else, when you deny that Jefferson wrote the letter to the Danbury Baptists, when you deny that discussions were held between Madison and Jefferson regarding this separation…I really have nothing at all to talk with you about. There is no common ground so debate would be impossible.

    Then it occurred to me that this Beck and Urquhart focus on Hitler is somehow related to National Healthcare.

    I read this in the Guardian today:

    The worldwide cost of dementia this year will be £388bn in social care, unpaid care by relatives and medical bills, according to a report published today.

    The organisation that commissioned it said dementia would be "the most significant health and social crisis of the 21st century".

    The estimate in the World Alzheimer Report 2010 equates to more than 1% of global GDP. If dementia care were a country, it would be the world's 18th largest economy, and if it were a company, it would be the world's biggest by revenue, outstripping Walmart (£267bn) and Exxon Mobil (£200bn).

    The authors of the report – academics at King's College, London, and the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm – say governments worldwide must follow the example of countries such as England, France and Australia in developing national plans to tackle the problem. Research funders must dramatically boost support to match that provided for heart disease and cancer.

    The report was commissioned by Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI), an umbrella organisation of 73 associations, and follows a similar report last year that suggested there were 35.6 million people with dementia worldwide, and that this figure would increase to 65.7 million by 2030 and 115.4 million by 2050.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/sep/21/worldwide-dementia-care-costs-338bn

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oECfhWrGfJU&feature=related

    There are 41 Republican Senators in the United States Senate. Every state is entitled to 2 Senators.

    So you begin a conversation with someone about Senate rules and protocols and your compadre says something like:

    What is the name of the Senator who represents Guam?

    Well, I mean it might be a good time to order a couple more drinks and discuss the fur business or the most recent entries on the porno sites.

    How on earth can you argue with someone who is mentally ill? Especially when that someone is running for a seat in the U.S. Congress?

    Dementia must be diagnosed early.

    I think they should set up public establishments where individuals teach basic history and such to children before they grow up to run for Congress.

    We could call them ‘instruction locales’ or something. Children would be required to appear at their local instruction locales five or six days a week for six hours or so and educated people could be hired to instruct these children on a variety of subjects including arithmetic and history.

    That’s all I got.

    Except this post is from:  http://tpmaholics.blogspot.com/2010/09/jefferson-baptists.html

     

    Comments

    Interesting, I had missed that one. In the past, I've seen religious right figures downplay Jefferson's remarks, since the separation of church and state is not explicitly articulated in the Constitution. But even Jefferson's unofficial remarks present a problem for someone like Beck who fetishizes the Founding Father's, and I was not aware of the Hitler workaround. If you can find Beck himself blaming the separation of church and state doctrine on Hitler, I would be grateful.


    You know Genghis, I had a buddy over at TPM by the name of Tom Wright...I am still looking for him here and on my various blogs.

    He showed up one nite about this time and commented:

     

    Don't you ever go to sleep?

    You are doing a hell of a job here. You really care about this place. here is a little bit about what I am talking about vis a vis Glenn and Hitler:

    Would you kill someone for that?...I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore...I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it,...No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out. Is this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus — band — Do, and I've lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say, "Yeah, I'd kill Michael Moore," and then I'd see the little band: What Would Jesus Do? And then I'd realize, "Oh, you wouldn't kill Michael Moore. Or at least you wouldn't choke him to death." And you know, well, I'm not sure

     

     

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Glenn_Beck

     

    Having said that since Glenn Beck has made the absurd claim that Hitler was more liberal than conservative I feel the need to defend the progressives.  Looking at all of Hitler's policies, not just the select few Beck picks, Hitler was clearly more right-wing conservative that left-wing liberal.  Though I would never say any of the current, prominent modern-day conservatives are on the same level of Hitler's craziness.  Let us now look at all of Hitler's beliefs and policies.

    http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/fact-check-on-glenn-beck-s-documentary-was-hitler-more-liberal-or-conservative

     

    ost conservative beliefs have a religious underpinning.  Beck himself cites his Mormon beliefs many times in justifying his political views.  Conservatives use religious reasoning to justify their opposition to gay rights, the separation of church and state, and the general loss of "morality" in American culture.

    The myth is that Hitler was anti-religion.  In reality Hitler used religious reasoning to justify his own policies.  Hitler focused on how the Aryan people had a "Christian heritage" with principles that must be adhered in order to rebuild the country.  This all sounds awfully similar to Beck's urging for us to return to the supposed Christian foundations of our own country. 

    Hitler worked with the Catholic Church to implement his agenda. The Catholic church has subsequently apologized for its role during the Nazi era. 

    One of the targets of Nazi persecution, in addition to Jews, were homosexuals.  Homosexuals were viewed as deviants under Hitler's government who were not deserving of equal rights along with other German citizens.

    http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-national/fact-check-on-glenn-beck-s-documentary-was-hitler-more-liberal-or-conservative

    I have done blogs on all of these much to the chagrin of Q who is sick and tired of taking the time to respond to the right wing radio guys.

    I have done blogs about this subject but I cannot find them now. I will research further...but beck has, no bullshit, spoken about separation of church and government in the context of Hitler. If I were a right wing nut, I would put the case in the context of Stalin.

    I can go on an on here. Can you imagine all the Muslims in the Soviet Empire? Can you imagine the angst created by the battle between the individuals who were sick and tired of the Eastern Orthodoxy and then this battle with the Muslims?

    Frick you  Stalin said as did Lenin, THERE IS NO GOD. HAHAHAHAHAHA.

    Which is a logical approach when you ponder upon it long enough.

    Oh well, I am ranting in the middle of the night, and I might not have answered your question directly....

     

    I shall research further.

     

    the end

     


    Don't kill yourself looking, but I'd be interested to see it.

    Tom Wright is great. He commented back at TPM that he'd come by dag, but I haven't seen him yet.


    BTW, I mentioned this on another post, but I'm not sure if you saw it--if you feel like enshrining your old comment of the day award from TPM, I think that I could give you an interface for that. We could stick the winning comment below the Latest Comments section on the right.


    Oh Genghis here is another link where beckerhead goes right for the hitlerisms:

     

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-may-12-2010/back-in-black---glenn-...

    I'lll get back to you.


    The only way to get Tom Wight to show up here is to call him a complete and total bastard.

    Tom Wright is a complete and total bastard.

    See, he Googles for that phrase pretty regularly. He's kinda like Batman, and you can call him just by saying, Tom Wright is a complete and total bastard.

    That should do it.


    I love tom and so do you ahhahahahaahahah.

    But jesus h christ, i mean you blog something in the middle of the night and the captain shows up and asks:

    WHERE IN THE FRICK DID YOU FIND THIS FACT?

    Hell repubs dont have to check facts. Why should we? hahahahahaahahah

    Anyway, Tom will show himself when he is pissed off enough. hahahahaha


    Remind me, what's the names of those two senators who represent Dementia?


    I get confused Rootman, I mean with my own cognitive difficulties and such..

    But I think they both reside in Oklahoma.


    Asking about the "name of the Senator who represents Guam" isn't as dumb as you might think. Guam actually does have a "Delegate" in the House of Representatives.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Non-voting_members_of_Congress

    Additionally, they have their own legislature (just as all states have their own legislatures), which of course have Senators.

    http://www.guamlegislature.com/committees.htm

    That said, of course none of these Senators "represent Guam" in the sense presumably intended (although the Delegate mentioned above does).


    It would be nice if this stuff was dementia, and not willful, malicious slander combined with ignorance. Of course, the Germans in WW1 and WW2 had the actual Maltese Cross or an abbreviated version of that Christian crusader emblem on every tank, plane, military decoration and flag. Use of that symbol in war doesn't seem to be separation of church from state.

    ...and as far as I know, George W. Bush is the only US President recommended for trial for crimes against humanity by a former Chief Prosecutor from the actual Nuremberg trials. Benjamin Ferenccz sent over 20 Nazi's to the gallows.

    Hermann Goering at Nuremberg, 1946. Benjamin Ferenccz, a Nuremberg prosecutor, said in 2005, that George W. Bush may have committed the 'supreme international crime' of aggressive war..


    I know, the fascists just call other people fascists.

    The racists call other people racist.

    It is playground rhetoric.

    But when you read some of the Nuremberg transcripts and such, it aint funny anymore.

     

     

     

     

     


    So glad to see you here DD! Great blog as usual, and as usual, you are the absolute KING of the segue.

    Oh CVille, warms my northern heart!!!


    Latest Comments