MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Monday's IDF commander was not a war criminal.
It's absolutely impossible to say who was "responsible" for that day's 60 deaths. The unspoken assumption underlying a lot of Monday's press coverage is that Israel was to blame. Rightly so?
Clearly some IDF officer was first to say "Fire." Wasn't he or she responsible?
Well thousands of Palestinians were approaching. Some had guns without doubt intending to fire them at the IDF. The commander had no moral obligation to wait for that to happen--for at least one Israeli soldier to be hit. Particularly given the 70 years history..
Doesn't that mean Hamas was to "blame" for organizing Monday's massive demonstration? But in that case isn't Israel to blame for authorizing West Bank settlements whose security arrangements inevitably humiliate Palestinians ? But only because Palestinian terrorism requires it.
Why can't they just show some Christian charity as Warren Austin said?
Where is Warren Austin when we need him?
Comments
Trump gave away placing the embassy in Jerusalem. He got nothing in return. Trump could have requested limits on Jewish settlements, etc. He requested nothing. Trump does not care. Netanyahu is trash. Trump is trash. Hamas is trash. The problem is that while Trump and Netanyahu treat Hamas as trash, they also treat Abbas as trash. Palestinians are ignored. The only outcome from the current situation is the same response to apartheid as we saw in South Africa. Israel has no moral high ground. Israel will lose the battle just as South Africa lost the battle.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 8:52am
Simple - what was their plan for engagement based on event not long ago when they fired on civilians, wounding thousands, killing dozens. Repeat performances indicate intent.
IDF is trying to send a message, but its messaging is likely a war crime. They're relying on the world to not care that much and the backing of the US to give them a pass. So we're complicit thru our immoral "leaders". Let's try "we didn't know" - hear that's a workable excuse.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 10:54am
It seems to me that the whole argument is contained here in this article by a Palestinian activist who helped organize the protests:
Isn't that all you need to know? You can't just drop a country onto the heads of a bunch of people already living there and expect them not to mind. Why can't these people return to land that was taken from their families without their consent?
The whole thing is one big war crime.
by Michael Maiello on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 3:47pm
Over 20 centuries the relationship between Jews and the rest was a crime without a war. Then they defended themselves.. A war without a crime.
Since then the settlements policy's been worse than a crime, a blunder. Two states inhabiting one space can't last. So it won't
But they're smart peoples and sooner or later sensible self preservation will replace romantic fantasies. If we can resist the temptation to try to think we know what's best for them. We don't.
by Flavius on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 4:43pm
Oh come on, you're being awfully forgiving. The Israelis are either smart or they're not. For 70 years they've had that land. For 70 years they've had the basic task, "how to make peace with your neighbors". They're not even phoning it in anymore. A brilliant country, excellent tech, billions from both donations and business acumen. And they can't be fucked with these little subhuman people living in the rest of the land they want... eventually.
I grew up where we supposedly would figure out what black people needed... eventually. And we're still fucking with them a half century later, much like the century before. Until they recognize that the solutions they derive for these people are essential to their reputation, well, eberythings going to be tough.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 7:40pm
No personal experience . Just from the media and travellers tales:
Until the Rabin assassination they were making an effort, esp under Labour.
Later, resumed effort until Sharon's visit to the "Temple mount".
That the consequent intifada and whatever else was going on eliminated what
remained of the 2 states solution margin in popularity.
As hoped by the bad people on either side.
In "To the end of the Land" whenever the protagonist emerges from the trail whomever she meets immediately starts to discuss the most recent "atrocity". . Just putting a stake in the ground.
Which is to to note the similarity to other oppressive regimes. Think Gone With the Wind
or Cry The Beloved Country. Or Turgenev.
The enforced subservience of part of society becomes just the
way things are. Until it's recognized as insupportable,
by Flavius on Wed, 05/16/2018 - 11:09pm
Try again. .
On re reading , the above is too allusive -and I should clarify.
The facts about Israel's founding are disputed. Most of what I believe comes come from Jewish sources. Plus Juan Cole.
Which is: great numbers of Jews who wanted to get out of Europe after Hitler's defeat were helped by Zionist organizations to get to Palestine where there was substantial Jewish minority in a majority Arab country.. Some were sufficiently violent , that , for example, they set off a bomb in the King David hotel killing important members of the British administration which was supposed to be supervising affairs.
The British left and almost immediately the country was attacked by an alliance of most of its Arab
neighbors .Which it defeated. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled some voluntarily , many because of pressure from the Jews . In 1967 once again they defeated an alliance of their neighbors.
Since then there have been were varying levels of violence by the Palestinians but also covert peace talks which culminated in full fledged negotiations in the 90s during which Rabin was assassinated. Any progress from the talks largely when ended when Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount prompted a renewed Intifada.
slightly revised
by Flavius on Thu, 05/17/2018 - 1:17pm
next to last paragraph should be modified, it seems to me, to read "Since then there have been varying levels of violence by the Palestinians, the Israelis, and interested others in the region but also..."
by AmericanDreamer on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 11:12am
Here's @ The Guardian is the "de-sensitizing violent entertainment" argument. (Comes to mind that a lot of us reject that when it comes from NRA supporters, or say, moms like Tipper Gore. Wondering if it fits here). And in the article, this show is labeled as a new more "fair and balanced approach" compared to previous fare, there would still be effects from past pop culture it is attempting to revise:
from
by artappraiser on Wed, 05/23/2018 - 1:35am
Oh, it's Overton and that buzzer experiment and our team/their team tribalism and getting caught up in the horserace and distractions, etc, etc. It's hard to sustain outrage, and that that is is often contrived.
by PeraclesPlease on Wed, 05/23/2018 - 3:12am
recommended; even if you think the author's spinning, there's those messy details in here that news junkies like and partisans don't:
by artappraiser on Thu, 05/17/2018 - 9:09am
Reasonable enough.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 05/17/2018 - 1:35pm
Thanks.
Perhaps straining at a gnat , but I disagree with characterizing aid to the relatives of slain fighters as an "incentive".
by Flavius on Thu, 05/17/2018 - 1:53pm
Idunno, that's pretty standard view of payouts for martyrs. Besides being glorified socially, family gets a wad of cash, and thus more are encouraged.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 05/17/2018 - 3:39pm
A cynical retort could be 'in whose interests was it for that view to become standard?' Conversely it's unlikely that any family facilitates martyrdom for the payouts. Or that anyone,not otherwise already so inclined ,martyrs themself for that.
But I agree that for someone who is martyrdom-ready it could tip the balance. So its " a motivator" but never I'd say "the motivator".
Which pin head will be the venue for the next dance?
spelling error corrected
by Flavius on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 7:15am
"it's unlikely that any family facilitates martyrdom for the payouts" - you might as well say "it's doubtful any mother would gladly send her son to war" - mothers have done that for thousands of years with different levels of enthusiasm and jingoism. Combine that with reasonable disgruntlement and payouts that exceed avg yearly income - ongoing martyr pensions - sure, it can increase the numbers signing up for violence and suicide attacks.
by PeraclesPlease on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 12:46pm
Some details on payments - dunno if the best article, but lengthy w numbers and cant be bothered to go back and see... can Google others.
https://www.welcometopalestine.com/article/the-palestinian-authority-mar...
by PeraclesPlease on Sat, 05/19/2018 - 7:06am
Thanks, Double A. I feel smarter for having read this.
by Michael Maiello on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 10:36am
And I now feel it was worthwhile tiptoeing onto an IP thread!
by artappraiser on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 3:16pm
You claim they had guns. I haven't heard or read any account that says they had guns. Can you cite a source? To describe Israel's human rights violations in the West Bank as a response to terrorism seems to me to be pretty tendentious--a lot of it was going on long before the genuine terrorism of the second intifada--and it would still be in violation of international conventions even if that were the reason.
by Aaron Carine on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 11:59am
Can you cite a source?
See point # 7 in the article link I posted above, includes a CNN video.. I'll repost here for your convenience, scroll down to #7 if you don't want to read the whole thing, though I recommend you do:
by artappraiser on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 2:55pm
From an Israeli publication.
Among the dead, the IDF said on Tuesday, were all eight members of a cell of armed Hamas operatives who were killed in a gun battle as they sought to breach the fence in the northern Gaza Strip.
by Flavius on Sat, 05/19/2018 - 12:55am
Probably true, although that was 5-8 guys(Hamas says five) out of hundreds of people shot.
by Aaron Carine on Sat, 05/19/2018 - 4:01am
I don't know; an image of people shooting at a drone the day after the slaughter isn't proof that any of the people who rushed the fence were armed, let alone "a significant number". I can't read Arabic, so I don't know if Tablet's account of what the transcript says is accurate.
by Aaron Carine on Fri, 05/18/2018 - 9:25pm
Essentially, Israelis are subduing Gaza just as European settlers have done everywhere they could.
https://therealnews.com/stories/killing-gaza-a-new-documentary-on-palestinians-under-siege
by Anon (not verified) on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 10:28am
Jews suffered under Europeans. Instead of claiming land in Europe as a safe zone, they went to an ancestral home in the Middle East. Arabs were displaced. European states got off scott free. Now we have European Jews battling Arabs. There is no peaceful solution coming.
by rmrd0000 on Tue, 05/22/2018 - 10:35am