Donal: Is Occupy Over?
Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR)
dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude
|
Donal: Is Occupy Over? Ramona's Piece de la Resistance (Including Pics of Obama, Romney, FDR) dagblog To Give Away Logoed Hairshirt To Most Effective Lamenter Of Left's Ineptitude |
Read |
![]() |
| NOT IN THIS GOP, FELLAS |
Herman Cain claims that the reason that black people won’t support him is that they’ve been brainwashed. And many conservatives are saying Cain is President Obama’s worst nightmare. I would have loved to have been in the White House when those statements came out. In spite of Obama’s laid-back demeanor, I’d be willing to bet that he was laughing so hard that he was rolling on the floor of the Oval Office in tears.
.
One would think that this man would have sense enough to know that no one takes him seriously - and especially the GOP. And if the GOP had ever taken the time to truly get to know the Black community, they’d know that the only thing more toxic to Black people than a flat-out racist, is a Black conservative (with the notable exception of Colin Powell, because he’s not really a conservative - he was just smart enough to flimflam the overseer, instead of the reverse).
.
Most Black people have very little use for Black conservatives. It's not that we disagree with everything they say, but because we’re suspect of the reasons they're saying it. With the possible exception of those who believe in talkin’ snakes, virtually without exception, every Black conservative I've ever known was a self-serving opportunist. Their conservatism tends not to be so much grounded in their actual philosophy, as it is an opportunity to gain exposure and wealth. They realize that conservatives are looking high and low for Black people willing to step forward to validate their views toward the Black community. So they gleefully allow themselves to be used in return for personal wealth, position, and notoriety.
.
Clarence Thomas is a case in point. There is no way that a man of his renowned level of mediocrity should be sitting on the highest court in this land - in fact, he shouldn't even be allowed to sit in traffic court. But due exclusively to his willingness to validate the conservative view of Black America, he's been given one of this nation's highest honors. Thus, Thomas' very presence on the Supreme Court is a stain on American values, our fidelity to jurisprudence, and an unabashed affront to every Black person in America.
.
Clarence Thomas is allowing himself to be used as a national monument to every negative stereotype of Black people ever put forward - grinnin’, subservient, lazy, White-woman-lustin’, treacherous, dishonest, and ignorant. Then every time there’s a State of the Union address, Black people are forced to sit and look at his lecherous ass.
.
So the Black community looks upon Clarence Thomas in precisely the same way as White Americans look upon a man guilty of treason against the United States - and other Black conservatives are not far behind. Why? Because most of these people would have happily voted against the Civil Rights Act in order to promote personal interest if they'd had the chance. And to demonstrate how transparent they are, Thomas took the unprecedented action of lobbying his colleagues to except what has now clearly been demonstrated to be a meritless challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to become President of the United States, while he didn't say a word as the Supreme Court casually APPOINTED George Bush president after he lost the 2000 election. And with respect to the challenge to Obama, it took his colleagues, some of the most conservative White men in the country, to tell Thomas that he was going too far - and Black people are brainwashed?
.
People like Thomas tend to be self-serving accommdationists who are wholly lacking in character. Black people have suffered a long history of such people, going all the way back to slavery - in fact, it was probably a Clarence Thomas clone who sold us into slavery in the first place. These were the very same people who would informed on slaves who were trying to escape to freedom: "I don't know what's wrong wit him, boss. Ya jest can't get him to appreciate nothin' you do for us. What he needs is a real good beatin'. Want me to do it? I’ll do it real good for ya, boss."
.
So having Clarence Thomas sitting on the Supreme Court, with his happy, grinnin’ face, eagerness to please attitude, and quintessential ignorance, is a bad joke at the expense of the Black community. His presence is the equivalent of giving every Black person in America the finger. It wouldn’t be any more insulting to Black people if they chiseled a picture of Buckwheat on the on the Supreme Court seal.
.
And now we have another ‘happy face,’ in the person of Herman Cain, saying that Black people won’t support him and his fascist overseers because we’re brainwashed? And this from a Black man whose advice do Black people during the deepest recession since the Great Depression is, "Get a job." Please! This is an absolute idiot.
.
Get out the whip, Rush - it sounds like Herman's been into your stash.
.
Eric L. Wattree
Http://wattree.blogspot.com
Citizens Against Reckless Middle-Class Abuse (CARMA)
.
Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.
Perceptive Dagblog readers know the difference between Obama, Romney and Bush:
Obama NYT today: .how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House....The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it. “Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”...Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy...
Mitt Romney, Feb. 2012 : LAS VEGAS -- LAS VEGAS -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Wednesday night blasted President Obama and his administration for “putting in jeopardy” the nation’s military mission by signaling it hopes to end its combat mission in Afghanistan by the middle of 2013.
Appearing at a campaign rally here shortly after landing in Nevada, Romney said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s statement Wednesday that U.S. forces would transition from a combat mission in Afghanistan next year “makes absolutely no sense.”....
George W. Bush, from May, 2003: BBC - "We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide... Free nations will press on to victory,"
Bush Afghanistan strategy : Gen. Douglas E. Lute, who had spent the last two years of the Bush administration trying to manage the many trade-offs necessary as the Iraq war consumed troop and intelligence resources needed in Afghanistan, arrived with a PowerPoint presentation. The first slide that General Lute threw onto the screen caught the eye of Thomas E. Donilon, later President Obama’s national security adviser. “It said we do not have a strategy in Afghanistan that you can articulate or achieve,” Mr. Donilon recalled three years later. “We had been at war for eight years, and no one could explain the strategy.”
Mitt Romney isn’t very far into the vice presidential selection process. But according to a dedicated band of conspiracy theorists, the pick is all but a lock: Sen. Marco Rubio.
That’s the current thinking among a worldwide collection of activists who are obsessed with the secretive Bilderberg Group, an alternating roster of global power players who loom as large — if not larger — in the online fever swamps of the fringe as the Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76518.html#ixzz1vN5egowz
Aristotle and Plato didn’t agree on much, but they were united in identifying wonder as the origin of their profession. As Aristotle said, “It is owing to their wonder that men . . . first began to philosophise.” This idea appeals to scientists, who frequently enlist wonder as a goad to inquiry. “I think everyone in every culture has felt a sense of awe and wonder looking at the sky,” wrote Carl Sagan in 1985, locating in this response the stirrings of a Copernican desire to know who and where we are.
Yet that is not the only direction in which wonder may take us. To Thomas Carlyle, wonder sits at the beginning not of science, but of religion. That is the central tension in forging an alliance of wonder with science: will it make us curious, or induce us to prostrate ourselves in pitiful ignorance? We had better get to grips with this question before we too hastily appropriate wonder to sell science. That is surely what is going on when pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope are (unconsciously?) cropped and coloured to recall the sublime iconography of Romantic landscape painting, or the Human Genome Project is wrapped in biblical rhetoric, or the Large Hadron Collider’s proton-smashing is depicted as “replaying the moment of creation”. The point is not that such things are deceitful or improper, but that if we want to take that path, we should first consider the complex evolution of the relation between science and wonder.
[....]
Pretending that science is performed by people who have undergone a Baconian purification of the emotions only deepens the danger that it will seem alien and odd to outsiders, something carried out by people who do not think as they do. Daston believes that we have inherited a “view of intelligence as neatly detached from emotional, moral and aesthetic impulses, and a related and coeval view of scientific objectivity that brand[s] such impulses as contaminants”. It is easy to understand the historical origins of this attitude: the need to distinguish science from credulous “enthusiasm”, to develop an authoritative voice, to strip away the pretensions of the mystical Renaissance magus who acquired knowledge through personal revelation. We no longer need these defences, however; worse, they become a defensive reflex that exposes scientists to the caricature of the emotionally constipated boffin, hiding within thickets of jargon.
... We’re trying to harness photosynthesis. A key part of photosynthesis is what happens when the sun goes down. Cells convert CO2 into sugar and fat molecules. And they store the fat to burn as energy to get them through the night ... We’re trying to coax our synthetic cells to ... store far more fat than they actually were designed to do, so that we can harness it all as an energy source and use it to create gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel straight from carbon dioxide and sunlight. This would shift the carbon equation so we’re recycling CO2 instead of taking new carbon out of the ground and creating still more CO2. But it has to be done on a massive scale to have any real impact on the amount of CO2 we’re putting into the atmosphere, let alone recovering from the atmosphere.
... We envision facilities the size of San Francisco. And 10 or 15 of those in this country. We need sunlight, seawater, and non-agricultural land, but you need a lot of photons to drive this. You need a lot of surface area of sunlight to do that. It’s a great use for Arizona. Lots of sunlight there.
... If we can’t get some key scientific breakthroughs within the next couple of years, it probably won’t happen in 10 years. So it’s something that’s really dependent on fundamental science. But we’re already able to do things that were once seen as impossible.
... I think the new anti-intellectualism that’s showing up in politics today is a symptom of our not discussing these issues enough. We don’t discuss how our society is now 100 percent dependent on science for its future. We need new scientific breakthroughs—sometimes to overcome the scientific breakthroughs of the past. A hundred years ago oil sounded like a great discovery. You could burn it and run engines off it. I don’t think anybody anticipated that it would actually change the atmosphere of our planet. Because of that we have to come up with new approaches. We just passed the 7 billion population mark. In 12 years, we’re going to reach 8 billion. If we let things run their natural course, we’ll have massive pandemics, people starving. Without science I don’t see much hope for humanity.
When Cain made the mistake of actually telling the public what he thought about the wording on the rock at Perry's family ranch, he was promptly told to shut up by Conservatives. His next action was to reassure those Conservatives by stating that racism was no longer an issue in the United States of America. Herman Cain's behvior fits into what we traditionally expect from a black
hustlerConservative.As much as I hate to do it, I'm going to have to defend Clarence Thomas. Although you don't explicitly say it, and might not even believe it or intend for it to be inferred, it's natural to infer from what you wrote that Thomas made a deliberate choice to be an opportunist. If that were so, then once he became tenured (i.e., made the Supreme Court), one would've expected his behaviors to change. They have not. Thus, I'm inclined to believe that, whatever else his faults are (and you gave a pretty good list), he's not insincere in his beliefs.
Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
No, I firmly believe with all my heart and soul that Clarence is involved in big time pay back.
Some liberal or liberals hurt him real bad back when and he is just paying it back.
He is stupid however, and that is why he never opens his mouth during orals.
If West were on that bench, no one would ever shut him up. hahahahhaha
Brain washing.
The 'Foundling' Fathers did everything they could to abolish slavery way back when (Bachmann) and this all took place in the 1500's (Perry)
And now other right wingers are maintaining that Slavery was not that bad an 'institution' and folks were gettin along just fine during Jim Crow.
Now that's real brain washing!
Your assumption states that no black person can choose to be conservative unless they are doing it for their own power, greed, and notoriety. This generation of thought hinders the black community and demonstrates that all blacks want other blacks to be liberal or they will ostracize them. Where is the free thinking and open mindedness in that belief? I assure you there is none.
I may not agree with everything that Herman Cain has to say or propose, but I don't judge this man by his race or idea of government.
Finally, when you say it is ridiculous that Herman Cain dare say "Get a job," that is the American way. We don't just hand out jobs or have the government create them. Go join the wall street protests as you probably have the time since you probably don't have a job. Everytime the government tries to create jobs, the private industry loses more jobs. Look at the statistics from 2011 and that will prove it to you.
Private industry created jobs during 2011.
If you agree with even some things that that arsehole talks about--you are either an idiot or an arsehole!
THE END
Black voters do tend to be Conservative, look at the response of the black community to the Presidential campaign of Al Sharpton , for example, blacks rejected him. Look at the response to Cornel West and Tavis Smiley, blacks side with the Centrist.
The reason that Republicans including Cain cannot garner much support in the black community is that there is a stench of condescension and racism that comes from the GOP. Blacks will not go where they do not feel welcome. If the GOP greets the white Evangalicals and Tea Party with encouraging words and then decides it needs to give instructions on what the community needs to do to black voters, then the GOP will continue to be an afterthought. I don't expect you to get or understand the message.
Wow, you show much intelligence with no stats, and Richard you show so much class and knowledge with comments like that. I am utterly not surprised with your response, but thought you would at least try to counter the several points I made about blacks hating any black that isn't a democrat. I guess I was right, there is really no comeback for the truth.
And your stats are in the mail...?
[This is a relocated reply from Open-Minded Conservative - In the future, if you are replying to a comment, use the reply function under that comment.]
Here are your stats:
http://reason.com/blog/2010/03/31/the-private-sectors-losing-job
Read the article. Completely unbiased fact based.
I can't believe you just called Al Sharpton a conservative. Have you ever listened to him? Why do blacks have to stick together politically. Caucasian do not do that by an means. Why does it have to be racial? The NAACP wont applaud Cain until they see a civil rights plan on the table. I don't understand that and I don't understand your arguement.
The Reason article concerns only one month in 2010. Looking at the latest BLS release gives a different picture. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
He didn't call Al Sharpton a conservative. He said that blacks were too conservative to vote for someone like Al Sharpton. So, it would seem you two agree!
Thanks for making my point clearer, Verified.
It should be noted that with redistricting, in most cases blacks are voting for blacks and whites are voting for whites. When a black person is elected governor or states attorney, it becomes a major news story. The idea that whites are more "open minded" in voting is a farce. Blacks have elected white mayors over black candidates on multiple occasions. Ask Maryland Governor, and former mayor of Baltimore, O'Malley.