The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age
    Wattree's picture

    Let’s Get Real - What We Call ‘American Ideals’ Are a Sham

    While this country professes to honor the ideals of freedom, independence, liberty, and justice, that's just lip service. We have a long history of stifling each and every one of those ideals, and anyone who doesn't believe that should simply try suing a major corporation for an injustice, or try embracing the "freedom" to live an unconventional lifestyle. This country frowns upon those things just like any other country. Gays and women are learning that lesson as we speak.
    .
    All of the institutions that are supposedly designed to protect our freedom and justice are nothing more than facades that are actually designed to give us the ILLUSION of freedom and justice. While I don't want to throw a monkey-wrench in anyone's comfort zone, it's very important for us to wake up and be realistic about what we DON'T have, in order to work towards actually achieving what I choose to call "The American Wish List."
    .
    According to "TakePart.com, "In 2008, eight states had no laws requiring students recite the Pledge of Allegiance at school. That number has recently dwindled to five, with Nebraska being the latest state to adopt a statewide mandate."

    .
    Many conservatives enthusiastically advocate that children be mandated to recite The Pledge of Allegiance in school. Conservative talk show host, Sean Hannity, said, "Why wouldn’t anyone want to say the Pledge of Allegiance, unless they detested their own country or were ignorant of its greatness?” Notice that even in Hannity's statement advocating the recitation of "The Pledge of Allegiance," which guarantees "Freedom and Justice for all," you can hear a clear indictment against those who may choose not to recite the pledge.
    .
    That's the kind of gross and narrow-minded hypocrisy that makes people not want to recite it in the first place - "I love the freedom, liberty, and justice in America so passionately that I'm willing to take it from you to get you to love it like I do." That's also what makes us look like the Beverly Hillbillies of the "free world" - rich and powerful, but as presumptuous, backward-thinking, and unsophisticated as they come.
    .
    The problem with many conservatives like Hannity, Limbaugh, and other's is they're so blind that they fail to even see the hypocrisy of their position. Thus, as a middle-class African American male - in fact, as a human being of good conscience - I take great exception with making it mandatory for our children to recite a lie as fact at a time in their lives when their thinking is being molded without their consent, or the consent of their parents. Because the Pledge of Allegiance represents the worst kind of hypocrisy, and it serves no useful purpose other than to brainwash the nation's children.
    .
    One would think that as a conservative Mr. Hannity would recognize that the very essence of freedom is the freedom of parents to raise their children according to the philosophy that they see fit. Therefore, forcing a pledge down the collective throat of America's children constitutes an unconscionable intrusion by government on a family's rights. It's un-American by definition, and it violates the very pledge that our children are being forced to recite.
    .
    A mandatory pledge is a blatant act of indoctrination. What other motive can we have for forcing children to recite a pledge that they don't even understand? When I was a kid coming up during the height of the civil rights struggle, I was forced to pledge my allegiance to a nation that frowned upon everything I represented, and was dead set on thwarting anything that I ever hoped to become.
    .
    At the same time, so-called "patriotic Americans" - while enthusiastically insisting that we recite The Pledge - simultaneously lynched African Americans, bombed black children in church, and formed angry mobs to show up and jeer black children attempting nothing more than to go to the school of their choice.
    .
    And shortly before that, these same "patriotic Americans" forced Black WWII heroes (the Tuskegee Airman) returning from Europe to give up their seats to German prisoners of war. Yet, there I was, standing there reciting the Pledge of Allegiance - "and to the republic for which it stands" - every morning. Even as a child, if I had understood the meaning of the words that I would later have to dredge from my brain just to be able to think clearly, I would have refused to recite them - regardless of the consequences.
    .
    And beyond the pledge being morally disingenuous and a monument to the worst kind of hypocrisy, the entire text is, literally, a lie: ". . . One nation under God." In light of what I've just described, what is that supposed to mean? "Indivisible." The Civil War demonstrates that's a lie. "With liberty and justice for all." I won't even waste the ink to address that issue. So again, other than brainwashing, what other motive could we possibly have for requiring our children to start off every morning with a lie of that magnitude?
    .
    Now, I realize that I sound like a wild-eyed radical, but if I do, it's only because I have a very low threshold for bullshit. I love this country, but I love truth and clear thinking much more. So I'm eclectic in my views. I believe in clear, unadulterated thought, and addressing every issue on its own merit. As a result, sometimes I agree with liberals, and at other times I agree with conservatives. That doesn't always make me very popular, but I'm more than happy to forego popularity in return for moral and intellectual clarity. I was taught that's what it means to be an American. Maybe I'm naive, but I took that lesson seriously.
    .
    I'm in pursuit of truth, not an agenda. For that reason I stand with conservatives on issues like set-asides based on race, because moral and intellectual consistency dictates that if you're against discrimination, you must be against all discrimination. Thus, if we're going to set aside resources for the poor, those resources should be available to all of the poor, regardless to race, creed, or color. Our failure to recognize that fact ran a lot of White people who marched with King right into the arms of the Republican Party during the Affirmative Action controversy.
    .
    Yet, I stand with liberals in being against vouchers. The mere fact that conservatives want to create an entitlement program "in the best interest of minorities" immediately sends up a red flag for me. Creating schools run by corporations is the fastest way that I can think of to create young fascists who are running around speaking in fundamentalist tongue.
    .
    A voucher system would also lead to a two-tier society. What would happen to low and middle-class children if private schools raised tuition  beyond their parents' reach and the public school system have been destroyed? I'll tell you what will happened - the parents would be chained to corporations to work for crumbs just so their children could learn to read and write.
    .
    Proponents of a mandatory pledge contend that our children should be taught to love and respect our country. It is my position that too much nationalism and not enough principle is what caused the kind of animosity toward this country that led to 9/11. We need to teach our children to embrace high ethical standards and principles, and then if the leaders of our country followed suit, the nation would benefit from the uncoerced love and respect of its citizens and the world.
    .
    Thus, the Pledge of Allegiance should not be a pledge at all. It should be presented as a goal. Then instead of lying about who and what we are, it would encourage us to focus our energies on actually becoming the society that we profess to believe in. Maybe then we'll create the kind of nation where brainwashing our children for their allegiance won't be necessary.
    .
    Tupelo, Miss. Judge Jails Attorney for Refusing to Recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
    .
    Eric L. Wattree
    wattree.blogspot.com
    [email protected]
    .
    Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.

    Comments

    This last link is precious, truly precious.

    Thus, the Pledge of Allegiance should not be a pledge at all. It should be presented as a goal. Then instead of lying about who and what we are, it would encourage us to focus our energies on actually becoming the society that we profess to believe in.

    But I must render unto you the Dayly Line of the Day for this here Dagblog Site, given to all of you from all of me.

    This is just a great, great line!

     


    Thank you, Richard.  It's time to start peeling the skin off the hypocrisy that we've been living with. The shear weight of it is dragging us under.


    It's just another in a long history of Idols who are proven powerless to fulfill any promises. We could take a log and cut it into two pieces. one we could carve into an idol and we could praise it, bow down to it, pledge allgiance to it. The other half, we could throw on the fire to cook with and keep us warm.


    Resistance, The latter half of the log would be much more useful.


    Wattree, I notice that you didn't list the five pledge-free states or even link to the article about them. I took the liberty of adding the link myself.

    Here are the states:

    • Vermont
    • Hawaii
    • Iowa
    • Wyoming
    • Oklahoma

    Interesting, no? I'm not sure that I've ever seen these five states grouped together. 

    I also notice that you neglected to mention the Supreme Court ruling that prohibited schools from compelling students to the recite the pledge. ACLU case? No, actually it was Jehovah's Witnesses.

    It makes you think, doesn't it? At least if you're the kind of person who thinks about such things. Politics doesn't always fall into pretty little buckets.


    I read about a case during the time the hippies were burning flags, in protest to the Vietnam War, but I can't recall the names of the litigants, Where the SCOTUS sided with the groups opinion, The court agreed IT WAS idolatry, but the court also recognized the States (Caesar) NEED, to indoctrinate the Nations youths, in order to get their service in times of War.  It would appear the right to keep government out of religion was a good one, but the State could interject it's own. Sounds hypocritical to me, the State could promote theirs in public places and yet deny others.


    The Jehovah Witnesses case was based on exercising their own religious freedom to pledge only to their God, and was from the 1950's.

    Numerous cases and GOP legislative chicanery related to the Pledge have continued long past the 1950's Jehovah case, in fact up until 2011, and have involved the ACLU defending students who suffer consequences for refusal to take the pledge.


    Thank you for this, Michael.

    .

    The primary reason that I didn’t provide the links that you sited is while I relied heavily upon the pledge to make my point, the history of the pledge is so universally understood that it only needed to be alluded to substantiate my thesis, which was, and is, "what we profess to be American ideals is a sham."


    We might be the "land of the free," but we will enforce conformity with extreme prejudice.  When I see things like pledge requirements I look at them the same way I look at the presence of a security guard at the exit to the K-Mart on Astor Place.  It's all theater meant to get you to conform to a certain type of behavior.  Security theater says, "these guys might be totally ineffective but there is security here, so behave."  Patriotism theater gets you used to not thinking and following authority.  If they can't make you say a short pledge, how can they expect to make you pilot a drone or charge across a battlefield with a rifle?  It all starts in school.


    We now have an all-volunteer military willing to kick in doors with boots, missiles, bombs or drones. There was the classic sign out up by soldiers in the initial part of the Iraq War, "We're At War.America's At The Mall".

    There are two different realities of combat.


    Let's not forget the gender theater.

    One doesn't need the army or national guard or mall cops to ensure the vast majority conform to the gender imperatives, reiterated in almost everything we do and say.  Have some guy dress up in drag and walk about town on a Saturday night and watch the average citizens enforce the conformity with extreme prejudice (and bodily harm).


    Makes me glad I live in Charlottesville, where such a guy would hardly be given a second look. smiley

    We have some really interesting characters in downtown C'ville. One of my favorites is an older gentleman who breaks out a harmonica, plays a single note, and then goes on to loudly sing songs such as "Danny Boy", "What a Wonderful World", etc., while dressed in a '70s leisure suit.

    A guy dressed in drag would probably have a decent chance of getting elected to City Council here, assuming people agreed with his platform. (No, I'm not talking about his shoes.)


    Coming on a day when the CEO of Apple is testifying before Congress on why Apple keeps $100 billion dollars in cash in tax havens overseas makes one wonder, since the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are people, maybe a new Pledge of Allegiance is necessary, taken not only by school kids but also corporations, and swearing fealty of money as well as self, vowing not to dodge US taxes.


    I guess I had always seen the pledge as a goal.  I had been raised to know about Wounded Knee and the underground railroad and water hoses and dogs turned on citizens standing up for their civil liberties and so on.  It didn't take much to catch the gap between what the pledge stated and the reality on the ground. 

    With that said, my jr high in Idaho every morning first had the national anthem played over the brand new intercom system, followed by the pledge of allegiance.  A friend and I refused to stand during both the anthem and pledge.  Our teacher flipped out and tried to force us to go along. The principle, however, stated they weren't allowed to do that, but my friend and I were to stand in the hallway if we were not going to participate. 

    For a couple of months, we started our school day being by being asked to leave the class so the rest of them could do their thang, with the teacher making subtle and not-so-subtle insinuations about our patriotism and love of country.  I think she was trying in the beginning to provoke one or both of us to lose control, but we had agreed when we first started to remain calm regardless of what the teachers or other students might say.

    Finally the teacher tired and we fell into a silent routine where my friend and I would walk out a minute before the intercom would blast out the anthem, and when they were done reciting the pledge, the teacher would poke her head out the door, look at us and then disappear, with us walking back in for the first lesson of the day.

    Surprisingly, no students said anything to us, affirmative or negative.

    I do have a question for you: are a-ok with neo-nazi parents home schooling their kids? I mean since the parents have ultimate say in the upbringing of their children...


    And by goal in this regard I mean aspirational.  There are times when this country (and by that I mean the people, whether as neighbor or governmental representative) has demonstrated the best of what it means to be an American.  It is those examples, in much the way that Obama spoke to the graduating students at Moorehead I believe recently about being role models, we should acknowledge and celebrate.

    At the same time, those times when we as a nation fall short of living up to our ideals need to be acknowledged, stopped and a new way of doing things begun.

    Affirmative action, regardless of how successful or not successful, was begun with the best of intentions to right some wrongs, to level the playing fair in the name of fairness and justice.  To the extent today we can agree upon where it has fallen short we need to make adjustments, with the same intention of addressing wrongs past and current.


    The title asserts that what we call American ideals are a sham ... and then the article proceeds to give a reasonably eloquent argument in favor of American ideals and a critique of those who fall short of them. It seems premised on an agreement that America's ideals are actually pretty groovy but that Americans - Republicans, in particular - suck the big one and are hypocrites for falling short on them.

    But. Isn't that the entire point of ideals? Ideals are meant to be aspirational - a tiny glimpse of something better to strive for. If they have been set low enough that they are easily achieved or, more absurdly, so they describe the current state of things .... you're doing it entirely wrong.

    I think we'll all agree things have moved forward considerably in terms of equality from the days of the Tuskegee airmen. I'd argue that it is the friction between America's ideals and the ways in which fallible men fall short of them that has been the driving force for that. Further, it is that friction that continues to drive us - for example, providing intellectual frameworks that can be used to call out Republicans for falling short of what are unquestionably admirable statements of ideal, even when used as platitudes.

    At a time when the direction we're headed as a nation and people seems so unclear - with indicators many aspects of society are solidly moving in a crummy direction - it seems a re-dedication to the ideals that brought us to this point might be more useful to getting society back on track than simply declaring that the measuring stick of America's ideals should be chopped down to represent the lowest human failure in our history of trying to live up to something decent.

    Humans suck. We can either wallow in it or propose ways to suck less and continually rededicate ourselves to the journey. To me, the pledge of allegiance is a statement of personal dedication to bringing about the shared vision of an ideal America - an America having the broad characteristics described. While it could probably be changed a bit and made even better, I don't think caveats would ever be appropriate based on the point of it.

    My personal view on the saying pledge in the classroom depends on how they're construing "mandatory". If it's mandatory for the teacher to lead a class in the pledge at the start of school every morning - it doesn't bug me much. If it's mandatory for the students to *participate* rather than non-disruptively remain seated if they do not want to do it .... that's a really big problem in my mind.

    I'm curious, how do you picture this "America is a racist hellhole and all of history is one big clusterfuck of hypocritical assholes falling short of what they say is right - especially Republicans - so, let's get some GOALS here, people!" message being condensed into a sort of verse that articulates an uplifting shared national purpose and lends itself to easy morning recital?


    LT no see. Cheers.


    I don't think the American Ideals are a sham. We prove ourselves again and again to not be worthy of them but our failure is collective in respect to them. But if there is a way forward, it is only those ideals we have failed to realize that will make it possible.

    It would be nice if the only thing stopping our society from being better was the end of this or that way of life. But change is not like that except in times of war.

    Martin Luther King Junior addressed this element directly; What divides this part of the nation is what divides these other parts. It is just one place.

    We are stuck with each other.