Our marginal tax rate is a moral hazard.

    The marginal tax rate was

    91% under Ike starting at $400,000

    70% from  Nixon to Carter, at $200,000

    28% under Reagan at  $300,000.

    40% under Clinton at $288,000. Which became 35%, under the famous Bush  tax cuts.

    (remind me why we can't afford social security!)

    If you were an AIG trader collecting $6 million in 2004 after taking a risk which might -and did- bankrupt your employer you'd have kept $3,900,000 to comfort you if your social security was inadequate. 

    Back under Ike you'd have kept less than $600,000. Theoretically that might have made you a bit careful. Only theoretically because no compensation committee would  have authorized that bonus in the first place, knowing that 91% would be paid to the IRS. Directors are fond of avowing their patriotism but that doesn't extend to taking money from the bank account and mailing it to Washington.

    When Obama and his brain trust were wrestling with the moral hazard of bailing out essentially every car company and bank, the fear was they'd then go back to the same old profligate ways. So some company should be punished pour encourager les autres (that's French for encourager les autres).

    But maybe wiping out the shareholders and firing the workers seemed sort of an indirect way of offsetting compensation so excessive it makes it worth taking a bet-your-company risk because if you collect (thank you Tim Geithner) you're outta there.

    We're met the enemy and it is the low progressivity of our tax rates.

    Comments

    Do you have a good source for those numbers? I'm not doubting them, it's just nice to have a source. My Republican father and I often have (amicable) discussions about taxes, and the more facts, the better.


    I googled  marginal tax rates and selected  History of Federal Individual Income  Bottom and Top Brackets. It was supplied by the National Taxpayers Union. It was in a table starting with  1913and continuing to 2011. with 12 footnotes .

     


    Here's the link, VA, to historic tax tables. It's at taxfoundation.org.

    Note that the numbers Flavius quotes are in nominal dollars. The PDF linked includes tables for both nominal and adjusted-for-inflation dollars.

    ​More interesting than just a comparison of the top tax bracket, to me, is the entire spectrum of tax rates. Take a look, for example, at the rates for 1952, adjusted for inflation: 

    1952: Adjusted for Inflation

    Married Filing Separately

    Married Filing Jointly: Applicable marginal tax rates are determined by the bracket (Married Filing Separately) corresponding to one-half of taxable income.

    Marginal Tax Rate: 

    22.2% up to $16.9K

    24.6% up to $33.9K

    29.0% up to $50.8K

    34.0% up to $67.6K

    38.0% up to $84.7K

    42.0% up to $101.6K

    48.0% up to $118.5K

    53.0% up to $135.5K

    56.0% up to $152.4K

    59.0% up to $169.3K

    62.0% up to $186.2K

    66.0% up to $220.1K

    67.0% up to $270.9K

    68.0% up to $321.8K

    72.0% up to $372.6K

    75.0% up to $423.4K

    77.0% up to $508.0K

    80.0% up to $592.7K

    83.0% up to $677.4K

    85.0% up to $762.0K

    88.0% up to $846.7K

    90.0% up to $1,270.1K

    91.0% up to $1,693.4K

    92.0% from $1,693.4K up

     
    Now compare to today's rates:
     

    2011

    Married Filing Separately

    Married Filing Jointly (Double the dollar amounts, below).

    Marginal Tax Rate:

    10% up to $8.5K

    15% up to $34.5K

    25% up to $69.7K

    28% up to $106.2K

    33% up to $189.6K

    35% from 189.6K up

     
    Once we believed in progressive taxation. But that was when we were building a country.
     

     


    Latest Comments