The Bishop and the Butterfly: Murder, Politics, and the End of the Jazz Age

    Romney's epitaph: "put up or shut up"

    Epitaph---not epithet, or even epaulet. The phrase, "Put up or Shut up" will most likely become the epitaph of Romney's campaign. For when you hurl an epithet at an enemy you play a game which can easily backfire. 

    "Put up or Shut up" is regrettable language for Romney because the flip side suggests the coalescing final attack, a pincer movement, which Obama will execute against Romney. Romney's best chance of winning the Presidential battle was to insure that the entire election be a referendum on Obama. In refusing to release his tax returns, Romney has opened himself to bombardments--- incessant questions and the immediate progeny of those questions---for example, what's the story on that adorable multimillion dollar IRA.? In effect, he is inviting new questions from the Obama team, as well as the press, without putting the old questions to bed.

    So the questions about Romney are multiplying. And thus the phrase "Put up or shut up" can be a foundational line of attack on Romney himself. To the extent that he refuses to put up any real answers to the questions about his taxes and personal financial practices, he is incrementally destroying his own campaign.

    So, put up or shut up. Or just put up. Or just shut up. I'm happy with any or all of these epithets.

    My opinion is that Romney will not release any tax returns pre-2010 and the basis of my opinion will prove that I am an irascible old guy. Based on my own vast marriage experience, I can reveal that a woman will first and foremost gather her children unto herself. I can't tell you how many times I heard from my wife the phrase, "my kids"--- when I was standing right there.  In fact, wives and mothers in law from some cultures, for example, Italian, will constantly render a man invisible within the entire family social structure. A mother in law who is sitting right next to you at dinner will ask your wife across the table, "Does your husband want another cannoli?" (don't blame me if that's not the correct singular of the word) 

    In any case I believe that Ann Romney is the final arbiter on the release of the tax returns, and the reason is her matriarchal instincts. I think Mitt made a deal with her and whether such a man did or didn't is nobody's business unless he's running for President and the tax returns would help explain who he is and inform his potential policy decisions. The world pretty well knows already that Romney will sell out any previous position in order to pander to the audience at hand. That's a public persona and is somewhat excused by the arena of politics itself. 

    In my opinion Romney's tax returns would show in graphic and very personal terms the compromised person he really is. How callous do you have to be to advocate giving yourself more tax breaks when you've already been able to compound your wealth by paying a tax rate grossly less than the average working person? And that's just for starters. What about the immunity from a possible felony? (o.k., that's slightly exaggerated).

    If Romney releases the tax returns, they are as bad as common sense suggests, and then he loses the election---well, how would any of this not be a stigma on the family? Ann Romney raised her kids. And she put her own bottom line out there when she was forced to do so---"you people" already have all you're going to get. 

    I'm not saying that Ann Romney was wrong in drawing a line in the sand. Good for her. What I think is wrong is for Romney to have misled his own party. What I think is wrong is running a campaign which is steadfastly trying not to put it's cards on the table in hopes of skating to a win on the back of a weak economy. What is wrong is acquiescing to the stall tactics of the Congress, withholding actions which might have make peoples' lives easier---like the transportation bill which needlessly took a year to pass--- for the sole purpose of defeating the President.

    So, Mr. Romney, I'm glad you introduced that phrase, "Put up or shut up." Because it applies to you much more than it does to anyone else in this election. And the phrase will most likely put the nails in the coffin of your own campaign.

    And, Mr, Romney, it is really beneath me but I'll say it anyway because it rounds out my theme. Losing the campaign most likely means losing the only chance you and your family will ever have of earning an epaulet.

     

     

     

     

    Comments

    I'm beginning to believe that not only in the tax return release debacle, but pretty much in all things Mitt, 'that Ann Romney is the final arbiter'. 

    I no longer consider him to be either 'the smartest boy in the room' or 'a man of  his own vision'.  

    Someone noted that Mitt, being akin to a cardboard cut-out poster boy, is a mere puppet for the 'causes and goals' of others and that Ann has always been the one 'behind the curtain' manipulating and directing.  A version of that ol' saw - 'behind every man there is a woman' (controlling the strings, 'dance puppet, dance').  IMO, I am considering this to be not only probable, but most likely the reality.


    Thanks, Aunt Sam. I definitely think Ann is the stronger one. It's too old a formula---she raises the kids, he brings in the dough--- for this day and age.


    Listen, mister, before you continue to slur women, Italians and the next President of the United States you might want to ask yourself why your wife felt compelled to keep gathering her your children behind her skirts!


    Oh, I got it. And BTW I didn't slur all Italians. And I can find better cannoli at a 7/11!


    If Reid is being truthful about his "source" than it's a former Bain investor.  A Bain investor wouldn't have knowledge of Romney's taxes unless Romney or somebody at Bain shared some advantageous tax strategy as either a perk or part of a sales attempt.  If Reid's source is real, would Romney really want the guy out there telling the story on the record?  I doubt Reid just made this up, by the way.  Romney or one of his associates gave somebody the impression that they had some hotshot tax strategy to share.  If that person comes forward, on the record, Mitt's got a problem.


    Thanks, Destor. It is interesting to speculate. I think Reid must have something on which to hang his hat. Hey, what about those Nevada-Utah connections?


    Mitt's got a problem, even if the source doesn't come forward. Because if he continues to stonewall, it will rightly be seen as confirming the allegation. It gets more damaging the longer he stalls. I think he'll continue to hide his federal tax returns, he'll lose the election, and history will tag him as a liar and tax evader anyway. Sounds fair.


    A commenter over at TPM says the IRS declared an amnesty in 2009 for people who came clean about hiding income offshore, and paid up. But it would be reflected on that year's tax return. I have no idea if that's true. Romney has released only 2010 and 2011. Hmmm.


    Interesting.  If he came clean in 2009 he could still say now that he "paid all of his income taxes" for the previous years.  It's not illegal to go kicking and screaming.  But it's also not presidential.


    "The pot calling the kettle black"

    Obamas commercial

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud3mMj0AZZk

    What has Obama done, to stop the loss of Jobs; has he repealed NAFTA, or any of the other trade agreements, that undermine the middle class?

    Has Obama suggested raising tariffs; as a revenue source, to support America?

    Tariffs to assure SS remains solvent, without deep cuts

    Neither candidate is the solution.

    'those that live in glass houses should not throw stones'


    I am going to write this again, like I've been writing since Mitt first said he won't release anymore returns, he isn't releasing them because he wasn't a resident of Mass when he ran for the position of Governor. I am going to keep writing it too. I don't think this is about paying taxes, I really don't.   If Ann doesn't want him to release those taxes it's because she knows if people find out they didn't claim Mass as their primary residency on their taxes prior to his running for Governor, which require him to have been a resident for 7 years consecutively.

    He is going to have to release those returns and until he does we are free to speculate why he won't.

    Fun read Oxy!


    Very clever, Tmac.


    Here's some more fascinating speculation:

    http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/10-theories-about-what-mitt-romney...

    The fun continues.


    That was a fun read... hahaha I like this one: He didn't tithe enough! Hahahaha, that cracks me up.

    Hmm, how about this: We want the Long Form 1040! Show us your long form Mitt. But in this case that actually means something.


    I'm beginning to wonder exactly where this guy was born. That was probably offshored too.


    OMG, OMG was he born in a yacht on Lake Superior on the *gasp* Canadian side? (There is a Canadian side, right?) I don't blame you guys for not claiming him though, but would you consider taking him back for a short time?


    In a bizarre twist on polygamy there are two Mitt Romneys, identical Canadian twins, born at the family vacation spot across the border.

    And the other twin is being declared as a dependent on the tax returns.

    That's why there was not enough room for Shamus to ride inside that station wagon. 

     


    OH NOES...Hahaha, that made me laugh hard Oxy.


    Seamus, the dog, is a low rent detective? Huh. That's deep...

    Not only does Lake Superior have a Canadian side, tmac, it's the "superior" side of Lake Superior. All my life, I'd assumed the name simply meant it's the greatest of the Great Lakes. Until I started writing this comment, when it suddenly hit me: the French explorers who first named it Lac Superieur wouldn't have meant "biggest"; they meant "uppermost" -- closest to the headwaters.

    Thank you for triggering that particular neuron; it's always a joy to think, "Damn, I understand something now that I only thought I understood this morning."

    But no, you still have to keep Mitt.


    acanuck! That is a great story actually, I had no clue that is what the French meant, you know Americans are pretty sure Lake Superior is American and that is what makes it superior...

    Fine.. we'll  keep Mitt, but hopefully as merely a citizen and not as the President.


    In both languages, the word carries the two connotations: "on top of" and "better than." Quebec-based fur traders Radisson and des Groseilliers reached the lake around 1660. As far as I know, they didn't circle it, so they could hardly have known it was the biggest. When they called it "le lac superieur," I don't think they were even presuming to name it -- they were just describing it: "the uppermost lake" or "the furthest lake." Somehow, that caught on as its official name.


    We've been down this tax speculation road before withBillary and came up a cropper. What happens if Dems put all their energy into Romney's taxes and he releases them and they're fine? Will be a big boost for him in Nov. I'd rather focus on his disastrous tax proposal rather than aSwift Boat whisper campaign of "afiend of a friend told him..." Don't like pure gossip and speculation for some reason.


    he releases them and they're fine?

    I could then imagine, the devilish Romney suggesting these sorts of statements

    "Here Obama shove these like a suppository, like you've done, to the rest of American citizens"  

    Obama credibility would be one big zero.

    Opening up a Romney counter offensive

    "Obamas medicine, is not good for America. or "We we don't want Obama's solution or prescription" or "Obamacare is bad for all"

    "Obama has already apologized to the rest of the world, WE are not looking for another Obama apology, when his American solution/prescription fails again and again.

    or "Obama is the problem and his solution are worse" 

    Mitch saying "we only needed an aspirin, not a suppository".  

    and all Obama can say in defense " Really, I'm not as bad as Romney" 


    I got somewhat lost on that one, Resistance.

    But I grant you, a tax return is much like a suppository, especially if they audit it.


    What? You don't even like PURE gossip? How's about I water it down with a few random facts? Ahem. "Newfoundland was the last province to join Canada, becoming a full member in 1949. NOW MITT, COME CLEAN ON THE TAXES, YOU DODGY BASTARD!"

    Also, a fiend of a friend? Seems to me that's a pretty likely description for most of your friends....


    "Friend" is euphemism, just like "uncle". Whatever money can buy.

    They won't be "fine."  They'll be legal, but they won't be politic.  Bill and Hillary were ordinary people, we're talking about a centemillionaire here.


    They'll be as legal as an amnestied alien...I'm going firmly with the primary exposure being application for amnesty in 2009 after appearance on the "UBS blacklist "

    If that is the case, and it may well be, it would be interesting to see the chain of command and timing involved in making the decision to allow amnesty for a type of tax evasion that would only apply to those rich enough to be hiding assets in overseas accounts. Could someone in the administration be forward thinking enough about likely candidates and their likely tax situations to have implemented that policy as a trap for Romney in this election or is it just a handy but unintended consequence?  
     I would bet that tmccarty's theory of residence is a good bet as are several of the ten listed in the article Acanuck linked to. We know that Romney, I mean his sloppy accountant, listed a house in Park City as his residence for tax purposes at the same time as he listed his residence in Mass. for electoral purposes. Then he supposedly moved into his son's unfinished basement for electoral purposes. I would bet ten to one that he has more than one tax problem and some of them may be criminal in nature if he couldn't lay them off as mistakes by the hired help. I would bet a thousand to one that he wouldn't go to jail if criminality was discovered. But that is a different topic and he still might get elected.
     Even if everything he did was 'legal', it doesn't automatically follow that it should or would be seen as 'right' in the country when the margin of wealth is so great and so many are hurting and afraid of a tax increase on their own incomes. I am sure that he would be politically, though not personally, embarrassed trying to explain some of his tax strategies.
     By the way, somewhere I read that the U.S. has tax laws which make us a tax haven for foreign rich guys to park their money just like the Cayman Islands do for our  financial elites.


    Bets, theories and perceptions. Sounds like Harry Reid's Vegas. Off to the craps table.

    The odds given in bets reflect the confidence a person has as to the right answer to a question or the likely hood of a prediction being correct  before the correct answer can be known. I think gambling intelligently by considering odds is a good metaphor for the calculated wagers, er uh, [hopefully] informed decisions we make every day of our life and for the answers we decide to believe. 


    That would have been a nifty bit of forethought if the amnesty evolved as you speculate. BTW, on the residency scam, there were similar indignant denials sans easy documentary proof before they retroactively amended the state tax returns to slip under the residency limbo bar. Mitt is.a serial generator of STUPID lies.

    If Mittens is consumed with the outrage of the falsely accused, his remedy is no further than the Cambridge office of Dewey, et al. He can take Reid for every cent has-actual malice, ya feel me? of course, truth is a defense.

    Reid's source is so likely exactly what Reid said it was.  A Bain investor.  If you run an investment company your big goal is to attract capital.  Current clients are your best bet.  If the CEO hasn't paid income taxes in 10 years, and it's legal, you damned well tell your investors about it.  It's a great way to start a conversation ("Would you like to not pay income taxes, legally?") that ends the way you want it to ("Also, we're raising a new buyout fund...")


    Mitt is turning this campaign into a pathetic 'game' of hide and seek, whether it's his taxes; campaign donors; specific processes for his 'plans' to fix what ails us and the list goes on ad nauseam. 

    It seems simplistic - Mitt does indeed need to 'put up or shut up' - I believe it's more than arrogance that's the reason for all the 'hiding'.  Hopefully, we'll keep seeking and prevail. 


    My theory on sourcing: Its an IRS agent. It's a veridical account. The agent calls Reid claiming to be Bain investor for cover. Because it's true, Romney is well and truely fucked.

    Whatever the reason, it's nothing illegal. Somebody from the McCain campaign would have surely spilled those beans in the primary to avoid a catastrophe in the general. 


    Maybe if they had known, Orlando. But the McCain campaign got the same information the IRS got, up to and including Mitt's 2007 return. In 2009, Swiss bank UBS was forced to tell the IRS the names of Americans hiding at least $10 billion in secret accounts. At least 3,000 very wealthy people took advantage of an amnesty program that same year to pay the taxes they had evaded and avoid criminal charges.

    Was Romney one of them? We don't know. All we know is that he does like offshore tax havens and so far has refused to release any pre-2010 tax returns. Even if you get pardoned for murdering a hobo, you still murdered a hobo.