we are stardust's picture

    Rupert Murdoch Bets on Education

    There are several things Murdoch is good at: making boatloads of money, influencing politics beneficial to his financial empire, and influencing thought and beliefs and artificial facts and directing them into less-than-diligent thinkers’ minds through various media.  In other words, Murdoch has an agenda, and he’s highly successful at fulfilling it.

    On Novemeber 22 he announced that he had purchased 90% of a company called Wireless Generation for $360 million, an ‘educational software’ company begun ten years ago by Rhodes Scholars Oxford classmates Larry Berger and Greg Gunn, who teamed up to create programs for schools that would link K-12 students, technology and teachers with individual learning plans for students and track their progress.  Here’s part of News Corps’ announcement:

    "When it comes to K through 12 education, we see a $500 billion sector in the U.S. alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed by big breakthroughs that extend the reach of great teaching," said Murdoch, the chairman and CEO of News Corp., which includes The Wall Street Journal and Fox Broadcasting Co. among its holdings.

    A recognized leader in the movement to personalize the educational experience through the use of data and technology, Wireless Generation also builds large-scale data systems that centralize student data, give educators and parents unprecedented visibility into learning and foster professional communities of educators with social networking tools. The Company is a key partner to New York City's Department of Education on its Achievement Reporting and Innovation System (ARIS) as well as on the City's School of One initiative, named by TIME Magazine as one of the Best Inventions of 2009.”

    Two weeks earlier New York City Chancellor of Schools Joel Klein announced he would be taking a VP job with News Corp “to pursue business opportunities in the education marketplace.”

     Wireless Generation’s home is in Brooklyn, and is involved in a pilot program called School of One, whose purpose is to create individual programs through software for students and track their progress, allegedly freeing up teachers and allowing them to teach to kids’ strengths and mitigate their weaknesses.  It sounds great on the surface, at least.


    According to the LA Times, New York City's Department of Education uses Wireless Generation's technologies as part of a Klein-led education reform initiative that gave local principals greater autonomy to run their schools -- but required heightened accountability for student performance. Among other things, the technology enabled parents to go online to check a child's attendance records and test results.”

    Wireless Generation is used by over 200,000 teachers and 3 million students, two/thirds of whom are in New York.

    According to The Financial Times, “Murdoch’s acquisition puts News Corp in competition with established education companies including Pearson, the owner of the Financial Times, McGraw-Hill and Houghton Mifflin, Harcourt.  Figures vary, but the US education materials market is between eight and 28 billion dollars, and ‘only’ roughly 15% of that is digital, according to Harry Henry  of Outsell , an information industry analyst.

    All parties questioned staunchly maintain that Klein has and will continue to avoid legal or ethical conflicts of issues pertaining to his new job and his old job and the wealth of information, data, and contacts he now holds.  Appointed by Mayor Bloomberg, he and Klein seem to share a business approach to education, and think that student results can be readily measured; the same for teacher productivity.

    Many others involved in education, would and do disagree, or remain skeptical that standardized testing is always an accurate reflection of knowledge.

    We’re left to wonder more about what sort of influences Murdoch software might have on public education, in particular.  I find it disconcerting that companies can not only design programs to improve student performance, but also evaluate their own program’s effectiveness.

    I wonder if they will branch into actual subject areas in the ways that Neil Bush’s Ignite! Software program so famously did, making learning fun by teaching history in cartoon form, etc.

    I wonder if NCLB and now Arne Duncan’s ‘Race to the Top’ reliance on test results and often even being tied to funding and recertification is being locked into the system as I type, with a corresponding increase in charter schools.

    I wonder if those charter schools will end up being homogenous in terms of race, class, culture and religion, thus discouraging kids’ social and cultural awareness of each other.

    I wonder how many school boards across the nation, increasingly heavy with conservatives and Christian fundamentalists will sign on to Wireless Gen programs.

    I wonder what, if any, ideological or skewed information might be included in their curriculum subject areas.  My mind imagines some horrific and possibly paranoid possibilities.

     Joel Klein’s tenure as Chancellor was stormy and controversial, as was Michelle Rhee’s at the Washing D.C schools.  They both can point to increased test scores and increased graduation rates.  Here’s Klein being interviewed by Jeffrey Brown.

    He was rumored to have been on Obama’s short list for Secretary of Education, and praises Arne and his program.  Detractors organized to dissuade the President from appointing him, citing various objections to his changes.

    Does he give any hints about the future of the Wireless Generation projects?  Or will he just be the legal and sales arm to Murdoch’s Vision?  What IS his vision and agenda?  (to be cross-posted at MyFDL)

     

     

     

    Comments

    "Why, Hroom, hroom..., Stardust; this diary may not be up to your usual standards.  What's up?"

    "Well, I've been scouring the web for days since this news came out, and no one is covering it except for the regular news outlets.  Almost critiques, no obvious trails to follow.  As as result, this piece has no hook, i.e., credible angle with which to focus your attention."

    "Don't hold back; tell us what you really think!"

    Sigh..."Okay; I am suspicious of Joel Klein now that he's signed up with News Corp; when I read about his ideological partnership with Bloomberg, Duncan and Rupie, it gives me the shivers.  Really.  I worry that the future of schools is no books, and we taxpayers will paying assholes like Murdock page-per-view fees, and our kids will be subjected to advertisements and Crap Thinking in their cute programs. 

    I'll readily admit that the Unions have protected some teachers who shouldn't be in classrooms, but this struggle seems to me more of a power-struggle with the NEA than an honest attempt to improve schools.  And I have a decided antipathy about kids sitting in front of computers that some idiots expect can teach kids.  Kids learn in so very many ways, and not all kids will thrive this way."

    "Thank you for sharing, Stardust.  How about a song?"

    "Certainly."

    "Why did you choose that one?"

    "Beats the hell outta me; I like the tempo and the harmony, I guess.  And it has nothing to do with Joel Klein or Rupert Murdoch, as an added bonus."


    Hahahaha! Like I said, what sets one person's hair on fire, doesn't upset others. Welcome to my world.


    Enjoyed reading the interchange between yourselves. Very ubiquitous and also funny.


    When I discuss things among myselves, I get to converse with a fool and a genius.  Fantastic!


    I'm destroyed that you have not commented on my diary--especailly after you painstakingly helped me embed a slide show for it.


    Ack!  I'll come; I have been darting in and out.  I saw it and hoped it would be on the new arsenic induced life-forms.  You never did pay the goodam fee, though.  Ans her I was gonna tell you how to miniaturize video, too. 

    Helpful Stardust Hint #23:  Never, ever get destroyed by a lack of attention from a whack-job; their attention spans make them untrustworthy as witnesses.


    Mai non, that's my life story.


    If there is any hope, and my local community is anything to use as a gauge, K through 12, as well as early childhood education, is a place where there is a lot grassroots energy.  There are some nefarious forces at work in the charter school realm, threatening among other things to divert much needed attention to the public schools.  But if people, from those in nonprofits to government agencies to local businesses to concerned parents (or any citizen for that matter) can leverage things like race to the top to make actual reforms in the education system that make a positive significant difference.  But it will take some sweat and perserverance.


    "...threatening among other things to divert much needed attention to the public schools". 

    And you want less attention paid to public schools?  No comprende, Senor.


    I want the opposite. Maybe it wasn't written correctly. Their threat is to divert the limited resources (which includes the community's attention, govt or otherwise) to charter schools at the expense of the public schools. Lacking resources, the public schools may suffer in performance, reinforcing the "need" for more charter schools, with the kids in the public schools the victims.

    Good; you wrote it backwards, I guess.That's exactly what I'm reading in the complaints against Arne'd Race program.  And that some of the charter schools aren't actually performing better, but are gettin better evaluations, maybe because of software programs designed for that purpose.

    Apparently even some public schools in the 'partnerships' have corporate people installed in central offices, helping to make decisions about spending.  I get really nervous when those involved stand to make a profit.  Ergo: Murdoch being biullish on education qives me the queasies. 

    And the initial bequests toschools must look incredibly inviting, then the bills come due later.  There is some magic about the idea that business does things better concept, and people forget the end of the equation: business want to make money, and some even fail at that! 

    I'm not loving the trends here...


    No the trend is not good right now.  Which is why anyone who is serious about education needs to find a way to get involved in their community's education reform process.

    One thing that highlights what it is at stake, and the sudden belief that charter schools is The Answer, is the interest in the recent documentary Waiting for Superman.  Here is the AFT's response to many inside and outside of the teaching profession, that we aren't necessarily waiting for superman.

    Charter schools unfortunately tap into our (in the general sense) need for The Answer, rather than approaching complex problems, which have muplitple complex causes, with complex, multi-faceted approaches.


    Thanks for the link; I had heard of Waiting for Superman.  Hmmm. 

    I will say I worked for a decade to better our schools here, in many different areas, and in almost every school committee, and never made one positive change there.  And tech for its own sake doesn't thrill me.  Our schools tried to push modules for K-4, with students seated around in pods, the teacher monitoring their activities from HIS/HER computer.  Brrrrr.  Hands-off learning, that is. 


    We have journey of a thousand miles to get the community to buy into something like art education is essential, but like all journeys of a thousand miles it begins with the first step.  The one silver lining of this whole charter school phenomenon is that it is allowing people and groups (like nonprofit and advocacy groups) to be involved in a way that they weren't before.  One of mistakes made by school administrators (as one would expect from a organizational theory pov) were too territorial in the past and limited involvement in the decision making process.  Now with the charter school threat (again, if my local community is any evidence), the local public school administrators are willing, in their intent to find allies, to give voice and power to those outside the public school payroll.


    That's really encouraging.  I've been amazed that this Murdoch venture has gotten so little coverage, ergo: no one's being warned what might be coming along to schools near them.

    I may try to streamline it a bit; I actually haven't had the time to post it at FDL, and those folks seem to care a lot about Ed. issues, though so much is coming so fast that it;s hard to know which issues to care about in a space of time.


    To paraphrase and modify an environmentalist from the Tin Wis movement, we're so busy putting out the multitude of socio-political brushfires we can't focus on the pyromanics who are setting the fires, let alone prioritize which brushfire is more important


    Murdoch owns this country.


    What's that worth these days?  $4.99?


    Good line. but the fact is that there are hundreds of trillions of dollars here. The debt could be paid in a microsecond by the bastards that own everything.

     

    This scare about debt is crap. hell...

     

    Just put a transaction tax on all sales of bonds, stocks, warrants, short sells, whatever....

    Our debt would be gone!!!

    ha

     


    I like the idea of a transaction tax.  Since investing in the stock market is basically gambling we can sell as sin tax.  Get the religious right to back it.


    Exactly what Dylan Ratigan says! 


    Just because Murdoch owns Fox News does not mean that everything he touches turns to Evil. In the old days, robber barons like Carnegie, Rockefeller, Frick, and Vanderbilt were in many ways more powerful and also more destructive than Murdoch, but they still engaged in some fine philanthropy.

    And while I recognize the flaws of standardized testing, Klein made a pretty good go of it here in New York. I'm not saying that he fixed everything, but at least he took some concrete action, which is more than we've seen in a long, long time, and there are thankfully a few new bright spots in the city's public school system.


    The problem is Genghis, that we attempt to educate children the way we build cars. On an assembly line as though they all had interchangeable parts. And those that do not perform up to spec get tossed into the bin.


    The problem is cmauken, that no one knows what the problem with education is, though everyone seems to have a strongly held theory about it.

    As to your strongly held theory, from what I understand, Asian countries like Japan and South Korea have much more assembly-line like education systems than we do. While there are many problems with such systems, they are at least more successful than we are in teaching their children math and science, which suggests that the problem with our math and science education is not too much assembly line-ism. That is not to say that I endorse the Asian approach.


    Interesting thing though. Some of are greatest minds and inventors were either kicked out of or flatly rejected this educational system. As well as musicians and artists.


    Although this is true, it's also true that they are the exception. Most of our greatest minds and inventors learned a lot from this educational system (or one like it). The system serves the gifted better than it does the struggling, although it could stand to be greatly improved in both regards.

    (I'd also like to point out that at least a few of the stories about great minds/inventors having difficulty in school are apocryphal, such as the stories about Einstein having difficulty in school.)


    The problem is cmauken, that no one knows what the problem with education is, though everyone seems to have a strongly held theory about it.

    I do - class sizes are too damn large (and that somewhat fits in with cmaulken's discussion of assembly lines, but only somewhat). If you fix that one problem (limit class sizes to 15, or maybe 20 for advanced students and 10 for remedial), many other problems will also get resolved. Of course, fixing that one problem also requires fixing other problems, as you'd need a lot more teachers.


    I've read that the better-performing charter schools have ratios around 1:20. (I've worked on plans for religious charter schools with ratios that were even lower.) I recall higher ratios when I was in public school, up to 1:30, and I read that it is even higher now. In my kid's school they've introduced classroom aides into the mix, so I wonder if the newer calculations take that into account somehow. I suppose that's like hiring more nurses and medical assistants instead of doctors.


    One of the charges I've read against Arne's beliefs is that 'class sizes don't matter'.  (Sorry, no link.)  That's hooey, though if some of the tech programs get inititated, one hook is that it 'frees up teachers'.  Can't say I like the picture much.


    I'm glad to hear a bit of opinion, Genghis, knowing Klein's tenure got mixed, but passionate reviews.  I'll admit that a man who signs up with Murdoch sets off my radar.  And the complaints aren't just about standardized testing,  per se, but as a sole metric for judging teachers and schools.  The graduation rate increases were impressive.  Working for News Corp, his job will be sales.  Seeing education as untapped profit doesn't imply philanthropy.


    Yes, Klein's work will surely not be philanthropic at News Corp. He was, I admit, a curious choice.


    In the old days, robber barons like Carnegie, Rockefeller, Frick, and Vanderbilt were in many ways more powerful and also more destructive than Murdoch, but they still engaged in some fine philanthropy.

    That's a very intriguing comparison, apt in many ways. I must think on it more.


    I have to say that your response reminds of the malfuctioning "smart bomb" in John Carpenters UCLA film Dark Star when confronted with phenomology.  Just saying.


    Morning here now, and I notice you imply I said something about Evil; I didn't.  I googled, and Murdoch's mum got an O.B.E. for her philanthropy. 

    There are lots of kinds of philanthropy, and Carnegie's library systems obviously benefited the country a whale of a lot; other philanthropists', too. Each person will likely guage the deeds and endeavors of different capitalists; the ones who made their fortunes on the backs of workers might be examined in a different light than a rock star's philanthropy, for instance. 

    Should Bill Gates get a pass for his efforts to monopolize the software market because of his huge contribution to AIDS eradication?  Does Robber Baron Whomever's slate get wiped clean by creating great museums?  You decide.  But don't ask the Socialist Workers if ya don't want an earful.  ;o)


    "Evil" is just a colorful paraphrase; I didn't mean it literally. Substitute "harmful influence" or whatever you like.

    As to the rest, I didn't make the point to suggest some kind of equaling of the balance on Murdoch's good-guy-bad-guy scorecard. The way I read your piece (colorfully paraphrased) was:

    1. Murdoch has nefarious plans

    2. Murdock owns Wireless Generation

    Ergo, Murdoch is using Wireless Generation to accomplish his nefarious plans.

    So I just offered the counterexample of the robber barons to suggest that the conclusion might not follow from the premises.


    You see, it wasn't a very coherent diary. The point I wanted to make was that: Given Murdoch's history of manipulation of thought, finance, politics, and communication, isn't it worrisome that he's going into the school information/tech instruction with programs that also evaluate their own program's effectiveness. 

    I clearly failed, even for myself, which was why I posed the 'wonder' questions at the end, hoping for input. 

    You bringing up Robber Barons' philanthropy in objection is a red herring.  I think of the Texas State Board of Education having such amazing power over the textbook industry to promote their personal biases against evolution, attempts to re-write history, etc., and am very twitchy about Murdoch's potential to push agenda into schools. 


    First, I do understand your concerns, and although I understand Genghis' counter-point, I'm not convinced by it. It's my bias showing, I'm sure, that I'm much more willing to assume "evil" when it comes to Murdoch.

    That said, when you put this into software you're making it objectively analyzeable, if its source is open to viewing by others.

    Consequently, they won't want their source open to viewing by others.

    However, at some level, all source is open to viewing by others, thanks to the wonders of many reverse engineering software packages. Laughing


    I spent hours and hours reading for this blog, and one thing I read was that Wireless Generation software is not open source, but that parents can access their kids' files at home.  What could go wrong?  LOL!  (thinking of the school that gave kids computers with webcams accessible to administrators).  ;o)

    I tend to lean toward creepy agenda for Murdoch; that dude's a bridge to far for me, and Murdoch + Educational Software = Eeeek!


    I had assumed it wouldn't be Open Source, as it seemed more like a Cathedral project than a Bazaar project*. That said, no matter how hard they try, it most definitely will be open source. Wink

    *That's a reference to the Cathedral and the Bazaar for those not up on Open Source lingo. Per Wikipedia, Cathedral projects evidently are actually open source as well, although I'm not familiar with that restriction and I'm not including that (obviously) in my description of them being more Cathedral-like


    Innocent  Doesn't stuff like that get ya arrested? Innocent  (None of these little yellow dudes have devil horns....)


    Only if you get caught. Laughing

    One could make a convincing argument that if you're only doing it for research purposes, then it's not illegal, but the DMCA would beg to differ, I'm sure.


    Should Bill Gates get a pass for his efforts to monopolize the software market because of his huge contribution to AIDS eradication?

    Jumping onto this analogy because I like Bill Gates so much more than I like Murdoch, but can still name numerous "sins" of his, what Genghis is really saying (or what I understand him to say) is the opposite: Should Bill Gates' contributions to AIDS eradication be viewed suspiciously because of his efforts to monopolize the software market, or even more strongly, should we assume his contributions have a sinister component until shown otherwise?


    Thanks, Atheist, you made the point more clearly than I did.


    No, because Murdoch is not a philanthrpoist.  I know logic bends my mind a bit, but I think this is a quarter-turn off, as in: it sounds like an analogy, but isn't quite.  ;o)  What have we seen of Rupert that makes us (well, ME?) suppose his definitions of improving education in America would me?


    True, one difference in the analogy is that Wireless Generation is a for-profit company, and Murdoch bought it, rather than donated to it. Still, I think that speaks more to his profit motive than to his conservative agenda. I could be wrong, but I would need some evidence of Wireless Gen using biased techniques to take this seriously.


    Waiting is. 

     ;o)


    Latest Comments