MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Geneticists not directly involved in the study said they are likely looking at Lanza's DNA to detect a mutation or abnormality that could increase the risk of aggressive or violent behavior. They could analyze Lanza's entire genome in great detail and try to find unexpected mutations.
Is it wrong to find this a little creepy?
Comments
I find carraiges that move without horses a little bit creepy.
by jollyroger on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 11:23am
The effort to prove that bad people are somehow identifiably different from good people has persisted through the ages. I don't think that these guys will have much success with this, but hey, more power to 'em.
Awhile ago, gaming entities funded an effort (possibly still ongoing) to study "problem gambling," and more subtly, to identify "problem gamblers." Because if you can identify the "problem gamblers" you can still market like crazy to regular people, secure in the knowledge that no ordinary person would ever develop a troublesome or dangerous gambling habit.
Neat, huh?
by erica20 on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 12:43pm
An uncle of mine, a good uncle, has a gambling problem. I went gambling with him more than a few times. He really just had a thing with money - he was a totally nice guy until money got involved. That may be an addiction thing, I think - money is a controlled substance.
by Orion on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 1:51pm
Maybe the study could measure the area of the brain, dealing with pleasure?
It was reported that violent video games, was a steady diet of Adam Lanza?
Would it be any wonder that he delighted in violence?
Maybe he spoke of this love or desire for more?
Maybe a red flag should have gone off?
But why wait to examine the DNA from a corpse
Test the young earlier in their lives, for possible defects. Hook em up and see what areas of the brain are stimulated, under certain conditions. A sort of Rorschach test could be developed, to ascertain if this person is susceptible to either pleasure or abhorrence.
Before a felon is released from incarceration, through a pardon, see if these brain activities, would ascertain, that the offender sill delights in their previous bad tendencies.
I also do believe, it is possible, to identify people with a propensity, to do bad things.
If one sees individuals, that frequents bars, or constantly talks about going to the bar, one might assume this person is possibly a drunk. Would it surprise someone, if this person were to drive while intoxicated and could be a threat?
Or people, who feed themselves, on a steady diet of pornography, and every conversation with these individuals, are about sexual matters. Would one be surprised, that such a person could commit a sexual assault? A date rape possibly?
Or people who speak hurtful things, could they DO hurtful things to others?
If all a person does is talk about their riches, can one assume that person is greedy? Could they have a propensity to steal to satisfy their greed?
An old parable states “For out of the mouth, the heart speaks”
For wherever the treasure is, that’s where their heart is
Wherever their heart is, you’ll know, they’ll speak of it.
We have to stop ignoring the signs.
The idea and promotion of letting each person “do their own thing” or the promotion of ”Whatever floats your boat” is not the best thing, for a civil society.
If the reports are true, Adam Lanza did do his own thing and he enjoyed violence.
The firemen’s murderer did float his own boat. He enjoyed killing.
by anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 2:19pm
A lot of unanswered questions, and a terribly written story. If a geneticist says the Connecticut medical examiner asked his university to study Lanza's DNA, the first thing a journalist does is confirm it with the medical examiner, and ask him what he's trying to accomplish. At the very least, I want to see a sentence like, "ABC attempted to contact Dr. Carver, but he declined to comment (or was out of town, whatever)."
Instead, ABC runs with the story, combining speculation from people uninvolved with the study with opinions pro and con. Shoddy.
I have no trouble with the sequencing of Lanza's genome for research purposes, as long as it's done legally (I would think family permission is needed). But the ME is seriously off base if he thinks a quick examination of the killer's DNA is going to yield anything useful to put in his report.
As one scientist in the article points out, you can't draw any conclusions from a single case; you would need a database of mass murderers before you can even focus on a specific genetic mutation as contributing to violent behavior. By all means collect that database, but understand it will take years before researchers can learn anything from it.
by acanuck on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 2:57pm
It's modern day phrenology.
by Michael Maiello on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 7:11pm
I concede there's no research I know of that links specific genes to specific behavior patterns. But the science is in its infancy; I say give it some time. We can already identify certain mutations with physical illnesses, so it's not outrageous to look for links to mental aberrations as well. It may turn out there are none, but the research is still worth doing.
Phrenology was right about faculties like hearing and vision being localized inside the brain. It went wrong in assuming every personality trait could be pinpointed, and making wild guesses as to those traits' location. But it paved the way for modern neuroscience.
by acanuck on Thu, 12/27/2012 - 9:28pm