MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
Presidential popular votes Elected to state assemblies in millions
Dem Rep Dem Rep
2007 2964 2399
2008 69.5 59.9 ?
2009 3058 2334
2010 3026 2353
2011 2468 2917
2012 65.9 60.9.0 2441 2939
2013 2592 2791
2014 2572 2802
2015 2342 3024
2016 65.9 63.0 2341 3052
One other number. After the 2008 election the democrats controlled 27 state assemblies , 14 were republicans and 8 were split . Now itś 14 dem,32 rep and the rest split.
Comments
Do these tell us about what we should do ? No. No doubt we´ll each be reinforced in our existing belief that we ought to
o move left
o move right
o keep on keep´en on.
The purely mathematical conclusion is that we´re not the ¨natural majority " . Not since 2011. And in simple minded terms the majority is ¨every one else.
But is that the Tea Party -everyone- else or the Bush, Romney , Ryan- everyone- else.?
Or just Trump?
by Flavius on Wed, 03/01/2017 - 5:26pm
Democrats lost a subset of white voters after the Civil Rights bills passed. Those voters never returned to the Democratic Party. Democrats lost white voters after Obamacare passed. Enter Trump. A major focus of Democrats should be on voter suppression. The Department of Just Us won't be on our side. We will be this on our own with groups like the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. The DNC can do simultaneous 50-state outreach, but the way back to office will be based in minority communities.
Edit to add:
If Trump gets a bump in approval. It will be from white voters.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 03/01/2017 - 7:41pm
I don´ t get the drop in democrat state representatives in 2011. I know that after the 2010 census the republicans out- gerrymandered us but thought that wouldn´t have shown up until 2012. I guess the process worked faster than that.
Yeah, of course if Trump get´s a bump it will be from white voters. And the subset of white voters that left after the Civil Rights bills aren´t coming back.As I recall Obama got 13% of the white vote in Mississippi.
But Ann Richards carried Texas a couple of times , Gore won Florida.-and therefore the country- if the Supremes hadn't put a finger on the scales; and Hillary matched Obama´s 2012 vote despite the best efforts of Putin and the FBI.
If the numbers are there; if there are more minority votes that can be set free from Sessions/ suppression, of course.But that seems like trying to fill an inside straight. Where I differ from you is that I look at Obama´s success and think that margin is still there.
I don´t mean trying to win by appeasing the old Lieberman, now Mancini wing . That´s not winning, it ś selling out.But neither do I think we can do it with a ten years younger Bernie.. It´s time for a 45 year old white guy who didn´t support the Iraq War.and doesn ´t live in Mamaroneck.
And if part of his winning coalition is composed of lower middle class whites who´ve got problems that he
can solve but are actually voting for him for the wrong reasons, well thanks a lot. They don´t weigh them, they count them.
by Flavius on Wed, 03/01/2017 - 10:55pm
Under Prez and Ellison, the DNC will go after those voters. The cynic in me thinks that those white voters are gone. Johnson won the South but there was an abrupt change in voting after he left office.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 03/01/2017 - 11:09pm
I´m in agreement that there are very few white voters worth going after in the South.
Conversely my South Dakota relatives
voted democrat in November for the first and likely last time but strictly because of their desire to see a woman president.
But whites in the old Confederacy have never accepted Blacks as their equal. The only reason to divert campaign effort there is to assist the black candidates in marginal districts not so gerrymandered as to be a sure thing.
Emotionally I wanted Ellison to win.But practically we couldn´t afford the luxury of doing the right thing.
by Flavius on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 9:35am
It might bewilder you that I regularly communicate with a number of liberals in the south.
Plus there continues to be large emigration from Snow Belt to Sun Belt, while over half of the large number of foreign immigrants settle in California, Texas or Florida - 2 of which I think are often referred to as "The South".
Perhaps these millions of immigrants become super conservative and racist the moment they step toe in the South, but I'd guess it's more dynamic than that, including a fairly large number of Asians settling in.
Or we could just give up - that would feel better....
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 9:50am
The South can turn with urban whites and minorities as a unified block.
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 10:10am
Mississippi 2012 vote for Romney
White men 88%
White women 89%
by Flavius on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 5:00pm
Democrats tend to carry larger urban areas even in places like Georgia and Texas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/kushner-flynn-sessions-ru...
A deeper analysis from Pew
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/21/the-growing-democratic-d...
by rmrd0000 on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 5:22pm
Under any circumstances there's going to be a democratic presence even in Mississippi and Alabama. I don´t have the facts but it seems extremely likely that as part of their 2010 (or 2011?) Gerrymandering the Reps created democratic ¨seats¨ specifically to have areas into which to isolate democratic voters so the surrounding districts will be lilly white. Thus creating something bearing a remarkable resemblance to what Trollope would have dismissed as anachronistic ¨rotten boroughs¨.
My completely un- data- based-hunch is that in spending a limited budget the DNC is more apt to get a return on its´ investment where there was a Hillary -first woman president-surge in November rather than in the ¨don'' t throw away you Confederate currency the South will rise again locales.¨ But the DNC will I´m sure will base its decisions on something like the Pew analysis you cite.
by Flavius on Thu, 03/02/2017 - 10:49pm
I like the Pew report, but it's optimism about trump's weakness is mitigated by the fact that it was published last July.
by CVille Dem on Fri, 03/03/2017 - 5:23pm
'Mitigated'? I think you meant obliterated by facts.
by Peter (not verified) on Fri, 03/03/2017 - 7:11pm
You never post facts.
by rmrd0000 on Fri, 03/03/2017 - 7:31pm