MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
political Universalism is a scam. It is a cowardly response to the alt-right. The alt-right openly espouses white supremacy. Universalism pretends that white supremacy will end if the Left simply doesn’t mention race. From an excellent takedown of Universalism by Leo Casey in Dissent Magazine
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/perils-of-universalism-race-clas...
The political path to uniting Americans into a powerful citizenry that can successfully defend democracy is one that involves the open embrace of our multiracial character, with the explicit recognition that the citizenship rights of racialized others are being targeted and must be defended by all. It is the crafting of a new response to the famous litany of German pastor Martin Niemöller on the rise of Nazism: “first they came for the Muslims, and we said . . . not in our nation and not on our watch: Muslims are our fellow citizens.”
Some critics of identity politics dispute this conclusion as a matter of political strategy, while being careful not to question its moral authority. More than a few have accepted at face value the political analysis Trump political commissar Steve Bannon gave to American Prospect editor Robert Kuttner in an unsolicited interview from the Trump White House last August. “The Democrats,” he said, “the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.” Bannon uttered these words in the wake of the violent white supremacist and neo-Nazi demonstrations in Charlottesville, and after Trump refused to unequivocally condemn them. By all accounts, he urged Trump to adopt that stance: Bannon has long stoked white racial fear and resentment. It is certainly not an emphasis on race and identity in general that Bannon sees as politically deadly: rather, it is a politics of resistance to racism.
Yet there is something to be learned from Bannon’s alternative to identity politics, his “economic nationalism.” The economic and social damage caused by corporate globalization and “free trade” over the last four decades provides fertile ground for the cultivation of a politics that promises to undo it. One powerful source of the unexpected appeal of Bernie Sanders’s 2016 campaign lay in the anti-corporate politics he advocated as a response to globalization.
For Bannon, economic nationalism is the way he seeks to combine his racialized appeal to white, working-class people with a larger conception of American self-interest. If he is successful, the two elements will merge: the economic well-being of the nation will be equated with the needs of white working people, and vice versa.
Rather than docilely accepting Bannon’s judgment that anti-racist politics are a death knell for Democrats, we should be asking ourselves what our plan for establishing an alternative political hegemony is. How do we identify the elements that are central to our values and critical in responding to the crisis of democracy, such as anti-racism, with a broader vision of the national interest and future? That road leads not through a binary opposition between the “universalism” of citizenship and class and the “particularity” of race, gender, and sexual identity, but in the hard work of constructing real political agency out of conceptions of “citizen” and “worker” that are opposed to racism, sexism, and homophobia at their core.
Too often, the American left operates as if a hegemonic political project on this order can be constructed through acts of recognition that employ a politics of symbols and gestures alone. It is tacitly assumed that once the left embraces the idea of a diverse mosaic of American citizenry and speaks in the name of a multiracial working class, the essential labor has been done.https://youtu.be/XbtNJMqAI-I
AA linked to video snippets of Joanna Williams ranting about identity politics. In the rant Williams criticizes #MeToo and the “demands” of transgenders to be accepted. Williams notes that she would probably fare better associating with white men than joining with women. Williams wants Universalism. She terrifies me. I’m looking at the mess that is the Kavanaugh nomination. Old white guys are deciding how charges against Kavanaugh will be handled. I would like to see at least some women in power involved in the decision. I believe Identity Politics has a useful role here.
Link to the panel discussion featuring Joanna Williams
When I hear demands for Universalism and for identity politics to go away. I am reminded of Martin Niemöller
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Universalism wants me to shut up and wait for them to come for me.
Comments
There is no equivalence between black identity politics and white identity politics. Even David Brooks realizes this fact.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/29/opinion/trump-identity-politics.html
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 11:26am
by artappraiser on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 2:12pm
It's about sucking up to the base & shunning "the other".
Ted's trying to make them forget he's really a Canuck with a Cuban father who overstayed his student visa so asked for "political asylum" - if only Mexicans could be so ballsy, but they weren't on the front lines of Communism nor our brothel of the Caribbean. Let me guess, Ted's an outsider, a Christian man, pro-2nd amendment, & would create jobs if only he knew how. Oh, & eats critters fricasseed on a spit - big down Texas way.
by PeraclesPlease on Thu, 09/20/2018 - 5:15am
Universalism allows for racism. We are always left with the question of who defines the norm? The norm has generally been defined by White males. The current Universalists want to continue that norm
From Étienne Balibar on the Violence of the Universall
https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/3100-translation-and-conflict-the-viole...
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 2:53pm
The Republicans drove the final stake through the fragile American heart of "universalism" when they divided the nation into Democrats and Real Americans about 30 years ago.
Universalism requires respect shown and compromise reached with the opposition to resolve critical and pressing national issues....not inflame, distort, manipulate, or forever perpetuate them for partisan purposes and personal gain.
by NCD on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 3:41pm
Fukuyama argued that the world would default to Liberalism after the fall of Communism. He was wrong then. Noe he’s back with the Universalism crap. He is wrong now. Appiah admits tgat Universalism could open the door to the white supremacists. If you watch the rant of Joanne Williams on the video of the panel discussion, you will be terrified. She openly attacks transgender people. Her version of Universalism has a very narrow window.
You are correct the current version of Universalism is actually very exclusionary.
Edit to add:
The Universalist s have the perfect scam. All you need to do is simply agree with them and things are fine. Speak up for your right’s and you are pretending to be a “victim”. Continue to demand your rights and you are a “narcissist “. The Universalist is perfect, they need change no personal behavior. Protest and you are a flawed individual.
All Lives Matter is the perfect Universalism slogan. They never do anything but complain about people complaining.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 5:05pm
Here is a snippet of a paragraph preceding an interview with Appiah in the Daily Intelligencer
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/interview-philosopher-kwame-anthony-appiah-identity-politics-wars.html
So in the setting of white supremacists on the Right demanding power, Appiah sees the biggest problem as identity politics on the Left. The Right is fixated on making white supremacy the way the government operates, but identity politics Liberals are the problem. This is sheer idiocy. It lets white supremacists off the hook.
by rmrd0000 on Wed, 09/19/2018 - 8:59pm