Dr. C: The Unpleasant Exclusivity in Our Educational System
Wolraich: The Grim Possibility Of War With Iran
dag Observes the 19th Anniversary of the Low-Speed Chase in LA
|
Dr. C: The Unpleasant Exclusivity in Our Educational System Wolraich: The Grim Possibility Of War With Iran dag Observes the 19th Anniversary of the Low-Speed Chase in LA |
Shuts & |
I'm tempted to write a post on this subject, but due to time constraints, I'm hoping y'all will be willing to read the article that prompted my concern and discuss the work of others, rather than my own views on this alarming subject.
I posted it under the "In The News Section" but I'm not sure how much attention those articles get.
http://consortiumnews.com/2012/06/20/strangling-the-republic/
I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
How Obama's pick to lead the FBI tried to put the brakes on the NSA's surveillance dragnet.
By Marc Ambinder, Foreign Policy, June 18, 2013
[....] Comey, who is said to be President Obama's choice to be the next director of the FBI, has never publicly disclosed exactly what he refused to sanction when he was briefly acting attorney general during Ashcroft's hospital stay, but people briefed on the program who have spoken to Comey say it was the legal rationale giving the NSA quick access to un-sifted telecom and service provider-collected metadata that "drove him bonkers," not the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program. There was just no way, Comey thought, to justify an effort that simply...
'Peace and reconciliation' milestone comes after US drops request for formal rejection of al-Qaida as precondition to talks
By Dan Roberts in Washington and Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul, guardian.co.uk, 18 June 2013
[....] White House officials say they believe the Taliban delegation at the talks represents the movement's leadership, and includes more radical groups such as the Haqqani network. Officials said the US would have a direct role in the talks starting starting this week in Doha, but the substantive negotiations over the future of Afghanistan would then be led by the Afghan government.
"The core of this process is not going to be US-Taliban talks – we can help the process – but the core is going...
According to some well-placed Israeli commentators, the best Israel can hope for is that Assad holds on but only just. That would keep the regime in place, or boxed into its heartland, but sapped of the energy to concern itself with anything other than immediate matters of survival.
In closed-door discussions, analyst Ben Caspit has noted, the Israeli army has put forward its “optimal scenario”: Syria breaking up into three separate states, with Assad confined to an Alawite canton in Damascus and along the coast.
A long war of attrition between Assad and the opposition has additional benefits for Israel following the decision by Hizbullah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, to draft thousands of fighters to assist the...
By George Packer, Daily Comment @ newyorker.com, June 18, 2013
The word “HACK” is painted across the main square of Facebook’s campus in letters so large that they can be seen from space. The term has lost its negative connotation in Silicon Valley; freewheeling coding sessions and virtual breaking and entering have become the same thing. The culture of hacking is rebellious, idealistic, and militantly anti-bureaucratic—fitting for an age that glorifies entrepreneurship—and it marks a stark shift from the recent history of scientists in American life. During the heyday of the space program, rocket scientists and computer engineers worked closely with NASA officials. The bureaucrat and the geek were not polar opposites but...
Where else but Maricopa County, ArpaioLand: 'A Maricopa County Superior Court jury on Monday found Michael Turley guilty of knowingly giving a false impression and endangerment steeming from hoax in which he sent his 16-year-old nephew into a street with a fake grenade launcher where he pointed it at oncoming traffic. While Turley, 40, filmed the incident, the 16-year-old draped his body in a sheet and wrapped his head in a scarf. The action was suppose to evoke a stereotype of a Middle Eastern terrorist.' .....

Depressing article stilli. And accurate I think.
This is why I have so little patience for calls to focus on just moving the ball forward a tiny bit. While we're busy advancing the ball one yard, the entire football stadium is being devoured by the Global Corporate Monster from Outer Space.
The problem we are facing is profound, frightening and deeply challenging. It is epochal in its historical significance. I wish I could tell you I knew where to find the people with the best strategy for change. I wish I were smarter. I don't want to just be mad all of the time. But what else is there?
Agree and share your angst.
Therein lies the real conundrum. Now, a thoughtful, realistic post putting forth some viable responses would indeed be welcome and needed. No blame game about the past/current sins and demons, only about how we can work towards a better future. Any ideas on who best to do this? Or resource?
Thanks.
I'll be seriously interested to see if anyone has any ideas. I have NO clue where to even begin (outside of trying to get as many people as I can to read and think about this as I can.)
A solution is going to take a ground swell of support, but the uber wealthy have done such a fabulous job of convincing SOOO many middle class people that they are the only thing keeping them from being amongst the poor (despite all evidence to the contrary) I'm not sure there are enough people to make it happen.
If the stories lately about the wealthy giving up their citizenship to avoid paying taxes isn't enough to persuade people that they have no respect for our country, I don't know what would.
I have to agree I am tired of being mad all the time. I'm afraid the Dems are too far gone, which puts me back into the whole lesser of two evils thing.
But to add parties is problematic, as well. You'd have a party more conservative than the existing repub party, and who knows how many parties to cover all the middle ground, and then a few more on the left. As polarized as we are now, it seems like it would be even worse.
Like you, I wish I was smarter. I would love to believe that the dems will reverse themselves, but I'm certainly not holding my breath!
I'm no historian, but it seems to me that there has always been an elite in any sufficiently advanced society, and that they are either the warriors or the wealthy, often both. I think America's large middle class has often masked that reality. I think the wealth extracted from other nations has often masked that reality. I think the easy wealth from fossil fuels has often masked that reality. But all three of those are in decline.
It is not just a problem of politics becoming absorbed by commercial interests. [Not to suggest that changes in election financing is not as important as the article suggests];
The problem is also the consumer. The consumer has this incredible power that could shut down this or that enterprise overnight. But the power of boycott could be even stronger if more people understood how they collectively create the conditions they live in.
In some ways, it comes down to the fetishism of commodities that Marx talked about. If the dynamic of that exchange is not completely controlled by the market, the market no longer completely controls the demand. Marx thought people were helpless in the face of that machinery. Maybe they are not helpless.
http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/Modern-Parenthood/2012/0713/Culture-of-clutter-taking-over-American-families-says-new-book
It seems to me that somehow the wealthy have been able to shape things in a way I don't completely understand. They have cut benefits and busted unions in the private sector, then used those people who got their benefits/wages slashed to undermine the unions in the public sector. Rather than people standing up saying why don't I have benefits like the public sector has anymore, the wealthy have them wanting the public sector to give up theirs as well.
It defies logic, and the only thing that makes any sense to me is that there are a lot of people out there who just don't know how to think, are incapable of thinking or are stupid. Is there another category?
There are certainly a large number of people who choose to support things that are not in their interest. It is easy to identify those who choose to support policies that actively work against their interest in an immediate way.
There are also a lot of people who understand that they support what they don't like but don't see an alternative that wouldn't put themselves or their families into peril. The latter group are often lumped together with the former. This sort of lumping together of people is a mistake.
I am not saying you are making this mistake but I know I have made this mistake.
Wealthy people defending their wealth is not a mysterious activity. Poor people defending their poverty is food for thought.
Too Late !! This was started in WWII and continued on and expanded and improved upon through the "Cold War", Korea, Vietnam...........
The transition is now complete. Welcome to USA Inc. ™