MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE
by Michael Wolraich
Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop
MURDER, POLITICS, AND THE END OF THE JAZZ AGE by Michael Wolraich Order today at Barnes & Noble / Amazon / Books-A-Million / Bookshop |
BENEATH THE SPIN * ERIC L. WATTREE
In the interest of full disclosure, as a journalist, I feel ethically bound to make the following statement that should be taken into account whenever I write anything associated with President Obama:
.
While I’ve written articles critical of President Obama in the past (and continue to stand by every one of those criticisms), overall, I’ve been such a huge supporter of his administration that I’ve been accused by some of his critics of being an Obama cheerleader. I’ve denied that allegation in the past, but after objectively looking over some of the articles that I’ve written over the course of his presidency, I now have to admit that I have indeed become an Obama cheerleader - but not because he’s Black, not because he’s liberal, and not because he’s a Democrat. I’ve become an Obama cheerleader because I love excellence, competence, integrity, and intelligence, and he’s demonstrated - at least to my satisfaction - that he represents all of those things. So I’m going to use this disclosure to try to help the public see what I see - one of the greatest presidents in the history of this country.
.
I've studied Obama closely over the years, and I’ve found that he uses history and the strategies of the past to make his decisions. As a result, he’s been brutally criticized by some on the left for not approaching issues in the way that they would approach them. But his critics tend to forget that he’s president, and we’re not, for a very good reason - he’s smarter than we are.
.
When most of us are passionate about an issue, we’re predisposed to fight to the bitter end for it. That’s an emotional response, not a thoughtful one. Take the issue of single-payer healthcare, for example. Many of us would have gone down fighting over that issue, but that’s exactly what would have happened, we would have gone down, and literally millions of Americans would have been deprived of affordable healthcare.
.
It’s easy to go down fighting for a cause when our home is not that battlefield. But take a moment to consider if it was. Let’s say, for example, that you had a beautiful and precious daughter who was twenty-five years old, but she had a dreadful disease that cost $250,000 a year to manage. So far you’ve been able to get by because she’s a part of your healthcare plan. But the problem is, her twenty-sixth birthday is looming, and she’ll be kicked off of your health plan on her birthday, and you can’t find another affordable healthcare plan for her due to her pre-diagnosed condition. That would mean that your precious daughter would be facing a death sentence on her twenty-sixth birthday. Would you be critical of President Obama’s willingness to "cave-in" then?
.
I don’t think so. On the contrary, I think you would get down on your knees and thank God that you have a thoughtfully practical president in office who's not so blinded by self-interest, ideology, and political concerns that he failed to taken your situation into account. That was the situation for millions of Americans across this country, all of them not quite so severe, but the quality of their lives were being devastated nevertheless.(http://money.cnn.com/gallery/news/economy/2014/03/28/obamacare-enrollees/)
.
So while some are jumping up and down and accusing Obama of caving in on healthcare and other issues, the president is willing to take the heat, because he’s practical, thoughtful, and selfless enough to see the big picture, and consider the needs of those who may not have the political clout to help themselves. In short, he’s willing to take the heat for those Americans who don’t have the time, and/or capacity, to make themselves heard. I find that very commendable, and rare, in today’s political environment.
.
And at the same time, he hasn’t given up on single-payer healthcare. It’s just that he’s forward- thinking enough to recognize that once the people embrace "Obamacare," and begin to recognize the benefit that it can bring to their personal lives, they’re going to DEMAND a single-payer system. So what was most important to him was getting the people used to the fact that they have a RIGHT to government-protected and guaranteed health insurance - or, "a right to life," as it were.
.
SHE DIED OF REPUBLICAN POLITICS |
President Obama is an unabashed intellectual and student of history, so he uses his knowledge of history in making his decisions and forging his administrative strategies - and the foot-in-the-door strategy is as old as the hills. So that’s generally the strategy that he uses to get the job done, in spite of unprecedented obstructionism by the GOP.
.
He knows the Republicans don't believe in reading and consider John Wayne-like ignorance as manly, so he uses it against them. That accounts for why he doesn’t get into spitball fights with them. Many on the left have also bought into the John Wayne syndrome, so they also see Obama’s quiet competence as a sign of weakness. But it’s far from that - it’s a sign of a powerful and unique intelligence.
.
The reason I’ve studied Obama so closely is because all my life I’ve loved going up against people who thought they were heavy. I used to stay in trouble as a kid for challenging the beliefs of adults that I thought were silly. My mother was constantly telling me to stay in my place. So I’ve always enjoyed debating and examining ideas, much like many men - including Obama - enjoy going out on the court and gettin’ into a pickup game, which I’ve never had any interest in at all. But I would hate to have to go up against Barack Obama brain-cell-for-brain-cell, because that brother is a quiet, unassuming, genius - it would be like my trying to challenge Michael Jordan to a one-on-one.
.
What the impatient left needs to understand about Obama is, contrary to the claims of some of his critics, he’s a very strong and confident man. He only seems quiet and docile, because when you have strength and confidence, you feel the need to prove it by trying to be overly macho. Obama is an intellectual heavy weight, so he doesn’t believe in trying to out-scream his opponents; he believes in out-thinking ‘em.
.
Neither does he believe in attacking the walls of a fort head on and going down in a blaze of glory; he believes in climbing in through the windows, because he’s not interested in trying to look heroic - that’s an ignorant and immature motivation. He simply wants to achieve his objectives. That’s how he got Osama Bin Laden. After Bush failed to get Bin laden, in spite of spending seven years, over a trillion dollars, and killing over a million people - including, killing or maiming thousands of American troops. Obama walked through the door and got Bin Laden with three helicopters and a handful of America's finest, without bustin’ a sweat bubble - and, while dragging Donald Trump through the mud at a dinner party in the process - and never once, breaking that quietly disarming smile. And thereafter, did he assemble the troops and news cameras to watch him land on an aircraft carrier and strut around in a flight suit bragging about what he'd accomplished? No. He simply walked away like it was all in a day's work. This is an extraordinary man.
.
So there’s a big difference between the GOP and Obama. The GOP believes in the power of money, strength, and the military. Obama believes in the power of the mind - and he’s killing the entire Republican Party with his intellect alone. Think about it. The scene in Washington, D.C. for the past six years has been much like one adult trying to manage a house filled with ranting and raving children. The Republicans have become so frustrated over their inability to handle his intellect that they’ve lost all sense of tradition and decorum - and they've forgotten all about the interest of the American in their blind, fanatical, obsession with bringing down President Obama.
.
And that hasn't been lost on the American people. As a result, I’m sure that there were many patriotic conservatives in America who disagree with Obama's political philosophy, but voted for him in the last election in spite of that disagreement, because their primary concern was what was in the best interest of the country. So the GOP’s biggest problems is not how they package their message, but making the mistake of equating being poor or middle class, with being stupid.
So yes, I’ve become an Obama cheerleader, and I never intend to apologize for that again, because Black people - and America as a whole - have a lot to be proud of in this president. He’s one of the last of a dying breed of true, old-school statesmen, who wear their flag pin on their hearts, rather than on their lapel. And as such, no one has ever represented us better. So as an American - and particularly, and African-American - I take great pride in that.
.
Show ‘em how it’s done, Mr. President. Show 'em what it means to be president of all of the people . . . President of the United States of America.
.
Eric L. Wattree
Http://wattree.blogspot.com
[email protected]
Citizens Against Reckless Middle-Class Abuse (CARMA)
Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.
Comments
Ed Henry should've turned in his press card after that answer.
by Anonymous PS (not verified) on Wed, 05/07/2014 - 9:21am
Hi, Watt! I've been gone for awhile (I was shocked to realize my last post was nearly 2 years ago!) and it was nice to come back and instantly see someone cheerleading for the President.
I can't tell you how many times in the past few years I've written "I'm happy every day I wake up and Barack Obama is our President."
It's not that I've agreed with every single thing he has said or done, but I am CONFIDENT that whatever it is, he's given it a lot of thought, sorting it out in a mature and thoughtful way, and made a decision based on what he thought was right for the majority of Americans.
I think that some day in the future he will be more appreciated than he is right now (or at least I HOPE that's true.) He has been demonized, lied about and disrespected more than any person in his position in the history of the Union, and I'm seriously ashamed of America for that.
I've had his back since that very first political post I did at TPM back in July of 2008. I've lost friends over my support of him, and I'm okay with that. I fully agree with your assessment that he is one of the best Presidents we've ever had. I'll be one of his cheerleaders until the day I die, and proud of it.
by stillidealistic on Sun, 06/08/2014 - 9:52pm
What are the metrics that cause you to assert that the president "is one of the best Presidents we've ever had?" I remember the writer of this blog once included one of those long lists of all these things that the president has done -- the kind of list that you find on the internets that goes on ad infinitum and ends up not telling us much. And, concededly, I've not read this current blog, but having not seen you around much I was intrigued by your comment specifically.
I happen to think that, with most presidents, there's a wait and see requirement before one is bestowed the title of "great." At this point, I give the president high marks for getting healthcare through, and I've come to conclude that it is here to stay, and that the glitches in the computer system at the threshold was bad government, but hardly indicative of what the ACA will mean for the American people. And I say this even though I am currently employed by a joint union-management benefit fund that is genuinely threatened long-term by the introduction of the exchange on the one hand, and the application of the so-called Cadillac Tax on medical plan which are the product of endless cycles of the give and take process of negotiations.
Beyond that, I'm not certain what it is to you that makes him great. Foreign policy? Not sure. Gitmo? No, period. Labor Law reform? Never lifted a pinky -- it was nothing more than campaign fodder for union folks back in '08, and nothing more. Individual liberties? Here I think he is utterly to blame for failing to rein the NSA in and to work on an appropriate balance between security and privacy.
Why do you think he's great Stilli? I just don't see it at all, and as someone who came around in '08 and then became one of his most committed supporters by 2012, I have to say that generally speaking I don't see what you see.
by Bruce Levine on Mon, 06/09/2014 - 10:00am
I'm not going to go into the whole list of accomplishments, they are available to anyone who wants to look it up.
And he TRIED to do even more and was thwarted (ie closing Gitmo.)
It's more "how" he's done what he's done, the decisions that he's made that were tough, tough, tough decisions - for instance going in after Bin Laden, when it could have been an unmitigated disaster, allowing himself to evolve on the issue of gay marriage, his willingness to stand up and say that global warming is real and try to actually do something about it, backing off on marijuana enforcement and giving the states an opportunity to see if legalization can work, trying to fight the special interests in improving the food offerings for school lunches, not giving in to the hawks that would have liked us to go into more and more wars.
Jeez, just the very fact that he gets up every morning and goes back to work in the face of the most vicious behavior of the minority party is enough for him to win my admiration.
He has restored my faith in the Presidency, after Bush destroyed it.
And I believe he has begun the process of getting this country to get more help in dealing with world issues instead of just jumping in and deploying the military. It is my opinion (based on recent conversations with people we've met from other countries as we're traveling) that he is improving our standing in the world.
And I appreciate his method. His calm, measured, intelligent thoughtful approach. I appreciate that he has a genuine concern for ALL Americans, and I believe he tries to figure out what is best for EVERYONE, not just his party.
I definitely believe he would have accomplished more if he had not been the recipient of the Republican's new plan - just say no. No to EVERYTHING, even if it was something they championed until Obama liked it.
I'm turning this into a short novel so I'm going to stop there. I could keep going. I hope I've answered your question.
by stillidealistic on Mon, 06/09/2014 - 10:48pm
I know you are married and such; but I still love you.
Wonderful.
Well said.
And how is that granddaughter that you taught how to read?
There are so many folks on the national scene who still cannot read!
THE END
by Richard Day on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 1:56am
Hey, Arthur! I love you, too! After all these years! Grandbabies are good, the 2nd and 3rd are reading now, too. The oldest just finished reading the Harry Potter series for the 3rd time. She insatiable!
by stillidealistic on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 2:56am
That's a wonderful testament stilli, thank you. How anyone could stop being friendly with you because of your feelings about the president is beyond me. Best to you and your growing family.
by Bruce Levine on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 9:30am
Thank you, sir! For many years I lived in a conservative bubble. I left and evolved in the process. My friends didn't, and some of them chose to disassociate because of it. Which means they weren't really friends after all. In truth, it's good to know that.
I look forward to being around more and reconnecting with you guys!
by stillidealistic on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 1:36pm
Barack Obama is Hands-Down One of the Greatest Presidents this Nation Has Ever Had - Period.
There are three reasons why Obama critics are desperately trying to obscure the significance of Obama’s accomplishments. First, his competence blows the theory of White superiority all to Hell; secondly, White bigots are afraid that Obama’s success will cause the nation to want to elect more Black presidents, senators and congresspersons; and finally, Black "bligots" see Obama’s very existence as a slap in the face to their personal status, and their delusions of grandeur.
.
As a result, Obama’s critics are trying to keep America focused on their criticisms whether than the President’s accomplishments, which are numerous. A small example of which are listed directly below (with a more extensive list as an attachment at the end of this discussion) - any one of which, alone, would have insured any president a favored place in history:
.
1). He averted a second global Great Depression with his stimulus initiative.
2). He Brought America back from the Bush Disaster.
3). He saved the American auto industry.
4). He brought Osama Bin Laden to justice.
5). He punished Wall Street and got the American Taxpayer reimbursed for the Wall St. Crash.
6). He’s brought affordable health care to millions of Americans.
7). He’s lower the national deficit to its lowest point in 60 years.
8). He averted a war with Syria and got them to destroy their chemical weapons.
9). He’s got Iran to allow nuclear weapons inspectors broader access to their nuclear facilities.
10). He’s accomplished all of this with the Republican Party fighting him tooth-n-nail every step of the way. In addition, a pouting GOP has forced President Obama - in addition to handling the nation's business - to take on the role as the sole adult overseeing a house filled with ranting, raving, and irate children. History will also take that into account.
.
If George W. Bush and the Republicans had been as competent in handling 9/11 and the Iraqi war, it would have saved over a trillion dollars, a million Iraqi lives, and the lives of thousands of American troops who were either killed or wounded in the Iraqi atrocity.
.
Just imagine what Obama could have done - and still do - with a RESPONSIBLE Republican Party. Naturally, Obama haters are going to vehemently disagree with this assessment of President Obama, but when they do, simply ask them who was a greater president, and why? Then watch ‘em squirm.
.
Here Are 235 Other Things That President Obama Has Done For America
http://pleasecutthecrap.com/obama-accomplishments/
by Wattree on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 3:58pm
The national deficit had been eliminated under Clinton (yes, he had help from a strong economy, but facts are facts), so I think you might want to strike #7. Obama might be the best president in recent history (and bslev brings up some relevant counter-claims), but let's not weaken the case with false claims.
by Verified Atheist on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 5:05pm
Verified,
Lookup the difference between "Debt" and "Deficit."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jul/25/barack-ob...
by Wattree on Tue, 06/10/2014 - 6:43pm
I used the terms completely correctly. Clinton eliminated the deficit, not the debt. The debt is higher now than it's ever been, which is not surprising, given that the deficit is positive (i.e., given that we don't have a surplus). The statement that Obama has lowered the national deficit to its lowest point in 60 years is clearly false, as he hasn't eliminated the deficit, and Clinton did. (It's also false that Obama lowered the national debt to its lowest point in 60 years, but as I already alluded to, the debt will continue to grow as long as we have any kind of a deficit, even if the deficit is only a penny.)
Edit to add: I just read your link, and what the link refers to isn't the smallest deficit, but the fastest shrinking deficit. So, in mathematical terms, where deficit is the first derivative of debt, the article being linked to is referring to the second derivative of debt, and the article is affirming the fact that this second derivative (or its absolute value, as the sign is somewhat arbitrary) is the largest (not smallest) in 60 years. This is definitely a good thing, but you'll want to be more precise in how you word your claims, as it is obviously false that the deficit is the smallest, when anyone who was alive in the '90s (or at least over 10 years old) remembers that Clinton eliminated the deficit.
Re-edited to add: I hope you understand that I'm not trying to be belligerent, especially considering that I was unaware of the fact that the deficit was shrinking at its fastest rate in 60 years. I really am trying to be helpful.
by Verified Atheist on Wed, 06/11/2014 - 9:22am
I understand your intent, Verified,
And I also understand your point, and I will research it further to explore your position. I too considered your point, but I assumed that there must have been some mitigating factor that the conclusion was based upon, like what we might have owed at the end of the year measured. I was under the impression that the numbers were being computed on the basis of percentage of GDP, but your point is not lost on me. I think your point is, the rate dropped faster and more steeply from one point to another under Obama, but not lower. So again, I’ll do further research for clarification, because I’m much more interested in presenting accurate information than winning a debate.
by Wattree on Fri, 06/13/2014 - 8:37am
You were correct, Verified.
I amended both the article, and my ‘Fact File’ to read:
"He’s presided over the steepest decline in the national deficit in over 60 years."
Thank you for alerting me to my error.
by Wattree on Fri, 06/13/2014 - 10:17am